Cited by 317Cardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Comparison of the prediction by 27 different factors of coronary heart disease and death in men and women of the Scottish heart health study: cohort study

Open access
Tunstall-Pedoe, Hugh, Woodward, Mark, Tavendale, Roger, Brook, Richard A', McCluskey, Mary K·1997·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To compare prediction by 27 different factors in men and women of coronary heart disease events, coronary deaths, and deaths from all causes. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Scottish population study. Subjects: In 1984-7 random sampling of residents aged 40-59 produced 11 629 men and women who generated survey clinic questionnaires, examination findings, and blood and urine specimens. Main outcome measures: Subsequent death, coronary artery surgery, and myocardial infarction. Risks were calculated for each category of factor or fifth of continuous variables. 27 factors were ranked by descending age adjusted hazard ratio of the top to bottom class in each factor, by sex and end point. Results: Follow up averaged 7.6 years, during which the 5754 men had 404 coronary events, 159 coronary deaths, and 383 deaths and the 5875 women 177, 47, and 208 respectively. The rankings for factors for the three end points were mainly similar in men and women, although hazard ratios were often higher in women. Classical risk factors ranked better for predicting coronary risk than newer ones. Yet strong prediction of coronary risk was no guarantee of significant prediction of all cause mortality. Findings included an anomalous coronary protective role for type A behaviour in women; raised plasma fibrinogen as a strong predictor of all end points; and an unexpectedly powerful protective relation of dietary potassium to all cause mortality. Conclusions: These initial unifactorial rankings and comparisons must be interpreted with caution until potential interaction, confounding, and problems of measurement and causation are further explored. Key messages: Among Scottish men and women studied for 27 risk factors for coronary heart disease and followed up for eight years classical risk factors scored strongly in predicting coronary risk but the performance of new ones was more variable Risk factors for coronary disease, and also for death, showed few, albeit interesting, differences between men and women Relative risk was often higher for risk factors in women but they had low levels of absolute risk when risk factor levels were low Smoking, blood pressure, and fibrinogen predicted coronary disease and also death, but other factors are less consistent Unifactorial results should not be overinterpreted, but the protective effect of potassium consumption is of particular interest

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.315.7110.722

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tunstall-Pedoe, H., Woodward, M., Tavendale, R., Brook, R. A., & McCluskey, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY
  • Ninewells Hospital (GB)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-09-20
Volume
315
Issue
7110
Pages
722-729
ISSN
  • 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
OpenAlex
W2061550204
Cited by
317
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
11.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
coronary artery disease, cardiovascular risk factors, all-cause mortality, coronary heart disease mortality, myocardial infarction, coronary artery surgery, sex differences, Type A behavior pattern, fibrinogen, potassium intake, smoking, blood pressure, risk prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Body Height, Body Weight, Cause of Death, Cholesterol, Coronary Disease, Female, Fibrinogen, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Potassium, Risk Factors, Scotland, Smoking, Sodium, Vitamins, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review