Cited by 79Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorHealth and Lifestyle StudiesNutritional Studies and Diet

How we eat what we eat: identifying meal routines and practices most strongly associated with healthy and unhealthy dietary factors among young adults

Open access
Laska, Melissa N, Hearst, Mary O, Lust, Katherine, Lytle, Leslie A, Story, Mary·2015·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: (i) To examine associations between young adults’ meal routines and practices (e.g. food preparation, meal skipping, eating on the run) and key dietary indicators (fruit/vegetable, fast-food and sugar-sweetened beverage intakes) and (ii) to develop indices of protective and risky meal practices most strongly associated with diet. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area, Minnesota (USA). Subjects: A diverse sample of community college and public university students (n 1013). Results: Meal routines and practices most strongly associated with healthy dietary patterns were related to home food preparation (i.e. preparing meals at home, preparing meals with vegetables) and meal regularity (i.e. routine consumption of evening meals and breakfast). In contrast, factors most strongly associated with poor dietary patterns included eating on the run, using media while eating and purchasing foods/beverages on campus. A Protective Factors Index, summing selected protective meal routines and practices, was positively associated with fruit/vegetable consumption and negatively associated with fast-food and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (P<0·001). A Risky Factors Index yielded significant, positive associations with fast-food and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (P<0·001). The probability test for the association between the Risky Factors Index and fruit/vegetable intake was P=0·05. Conclusions: Meal routines and practices were significantly associated with young adults’ dietary patterns, suggesting that ways in which individuals structure mealtimes and contextual characteristics of eating likely influence food choice. Thus, in addition to considering specific food choices, it also may be important to consider the context of mealtimes in developing dietary messaging and guidelines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980014002717

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laska, M. N., Hearst, M. O., Lust, K., Lytle, L. A., & Story, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Laska, Melissa N
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2014-12-02
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
2135-2145
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2104881170
Cited by
79
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • University of Minnesota
  • National Cancer Institute (K07CA126837, U54CA116849)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
meal skipping, home food preparation, meal regularity, fruit and vegetable intake, fast food consumption, sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, young adults, university students, dietary habits
MeSH terms
Beverages, Energy Intake, Choice Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethnicity, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Fruit, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Minnesota, Nutrition Surveys, Schools, Vegetables, Health Behavior, Nutrition Assessment, Linear Models, Young Adult, Fast Foods, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review