Cited by 303Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

The impact of racism on clinician cognition, behavior, and clinical decision making

Open access
van Ryn, Michelle, Burgess, Diana J., Dovidio, John F., Phelan, Sean M., Saha, Somnath, Malat, Jennifer, Griffin, Joan M., Fu, Steven S. +1 more·2011·Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

Abstract

Over the past two decades, thousands of studies have demonstrated that Blacks receive lower quality medical care than Whites, independent of disease status, setting, insurance, and other clinically relevant factors. Despite this, there has been little progress towards eradicating these inequities. Almost a decade ago we proposed a conceptual model identifying mechanisms through which clinicians' behavior, cognition, and decision making might be influenced by implicit racial biases and explicit racial stereotypes, and thereby contribute to racial inequities in care. Empirical evidence has supported many of these hypothesized mechanisms, demonstrating that White medical care clinicians: (1) hold negative implicit racial biases and explicit racial stereotypes, (2) have implicit racial biases that persist independently of and in contrast to their explicit (conscious) racial attitudes, and (3) can be influenced by racial bias in their clinical decision making and behavior during encounters with Black patients. This paper applies evidence from several disciplines to further specify our original model and elaborate on the ways racism can interact with cognitive biases to affect clinicians' behavior and decisions and in turn, patient behavior and decisions. We then highlight avenues for intervention and make specific recommendations to medical care and grant-making organizations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1742058x11000191

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent research documents the persistence of racial inequities in the quality and intensity of care.

    “More recent research documents the persistence of racial inequities in the quality and intensity of care [65,66].”
  • Higher implicit bias scores among physicians are associated with biased treatment recommendations in the care of black patients, although the pattern is not uniform.

    “Research reveals that higher implicit bias scores among physicians is associated with biased treatment recommendations in the care of black patients [66], although the pattern is not uniform [72].”
  • Implicit biases may affect not only medical decision making but also the quality of communication and nonverbal behavior.

    “Implicit biases may affect not only medical decision making but also the quality of communication and nonverbal behavior [66].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. American Medical Association (AMA) 2005 Quality Health Care for Minorities: Understanding Physicians’ Experiences: Physicians Are Becoming Engaged in Addressing Disparities: Preliminary Survey Brief 〈 http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/public-health/eliminating-health-disparities/commission-end-health-care-disparities/quality-health-care-minorities-understanding-physicians.shtml〉 accessed August 3, 2010
  2. Beach MC Price EG Gary TL Robinson KA Gozu A Palacio A Smarth C Jenckes MW Feuerstein C Bass EB Powe NR Cooper LA 2005 Cultural Competence: A Systematic Review of Health Care Provider Educational Interventions Medical Care 43 4 356 373 15778639 PMC3137284
  3. Branscombe NR Schmitt MT Schiffhauer K 2006 Racial Attitudes in Response to Thoughts of White Privilege European Journal of Social Psychology 37 2 203 215
  4. Burgess DJ Phelan S Dovidio J van Ryn M Forthcoming The Effect of Medical Authoritarianism on Physicians’ Attitudes and Treatment Decisions for Chronic Pain Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  5. Commission to End Health Care Disparities 2005 Preliminary Survey Brief: Physicians Are Becoming Engaged in Addressing Disparities Quality Health Care for Minorities: Understanding Physicians’ Experiences 〈 http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/public-health/eliminating-health-disparities/commission-end-health-care-disparities/quality-health-care-minorities-understanding-physicians.shtml〉 accessed August 3, 2010
  6. Delgado R Stefancic J 2001 Critical Race Theory: An Introduction New York New York University Press
  7. Devine PG Monteith MJ Mackie DM Hamilton DL 1993 The Role of Discrepancy-Associated Affect in Prejudice Reduction Affect, Cognition, and Steroetyping: Interactive Processes in Group Perception 317 344 New York Academic Press
  8. Dovidio JF Gaertner L Zanna Mark P 2004 Aversive Racism Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1 51 San Diego, CA Academic Press
  9. Dovidio John F Gaertner Samuel L Isen Alice M Lowrance Robert 1995 Group Representations and Intergroup Bias: Positive Affect, Similarity, and Group Size Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 8 856 865
  10. Dovidio JF Gaertner SL Stewart TL Esses VM Ten Vergert M Stephan WG Vogt P 2004 From Intervention to Outcomes: Processes in the Reduction of Bias Intergroup Relations Programs: Practice, Research, and Theory 243 265 New York Teachers College Press
  11. Dovidio J Kawakami K Beach K Brown R Gaertner SL 2001 Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: Examination of the Relationship Between Measures of Intergroup Bias Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Vol. 4. Intergroup Relations 175 197 Oxford, England Blackwell
  12. Dovidio J Kawakami K Johnson C Johnson B Howard A 1997b The Nature of Prejudice: Automatic and Controlled Processes Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33 510 540
  13. Gaertner SL Dovidio JF 2000 Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model Philadelphia, PA Psychology Press
  14. Gates H Steele C 2009 A Conversation with Claude M. Steele: Stereotype Threat and Black Achievement Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 6 2 251 271
  15. Johnson Kareem J Fredrickson Barbara L 2005 “We All Look the Same to Me”: Positive Emotions Eliminate the Own-Race Bias in Face Recognition Psychological Science 16 875 881 16262774 PMC1808554
  16. Jost JT Banaji MR 1994 The Role of Stereotyping in System-Justification and the Production of False Consciousness British Journal of Social Psychology 33 1 27
  17. McConnell AR Leibold JM 2001 Relations Between the Implicit Association Test, Explicit Racial Attitudes, and Discriminatory Behavior Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37 435 442
  18. Pettigrew TF Tropp LR 2008 How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? Meta-Analytic Tests of Three Mediators European Journal of Social Psychology 38 6 922 934
  19. Pratto Felicia Sidanius Jim Stallworth Lisa M Malle Bertram F 1994 Social Dominance Orientation: A Personality Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 4 741 763
  20. Sidanius J Levin S Federico C Pratto F Jost JT Major B 2001 Legitimizing Ideologies: The Social Dominance Approach The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations 307 331 New York Cambridge University Press
  21. Bear Siegel BD Andres E Mead H 2009 Measuring Equity: An Index of Health Care Disparities Quality Managed Health Care 18 2 84 90 19369851
  22. Smedley BD Stith AY Nelson AR 2003 Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Washington, DC National Academy Press 25032386
  23. Spencer SJ Steele CM Quinn DM 1999 Stereotype Threat and Women’s Math Performance Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35 4 28
  24. White-Means S Zhiyong Dong Hufstader M Brown LT 2009 Cultural Competency, Race, and Skin Tone Bias among Pharmacy, Nursing, and Medical Students: Implications for Addressing Health Disparities Medical Care Research Review 66 4 436 455 19369696

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Ryn, M., Burgess, D. J., Dovidio, J. F., Phelan, S. M., Saha, S., Malat, J., Griffin, J. M., Fu, S. S., & Perry, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Venue
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race
Published
2011
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
199-218
ISSN
  • 1742-058X (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-0598
OpenAlex
W2166878213
Cited by
303
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
23.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL085631)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
racism, implicit racial bias, clinical decision-making, racial disparities in health care, Black patients, patient behavior, bias interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review