Cited by 182Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCultural Competency in Health CareRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Mindfulness practice: A promising approach to reducing the effects of clinician implicit bias on patients

Burgess, Diana J., Beach, Mary Catherine, Saha, Somnath·2017·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Like the population at large, health care providers hold implicit racial and ethnic biases that may contribute to health care disparities. Little progress has been made in identifying and implementing effective strategies to address these normal but potentially harmful unconscious cognitive processes. We propose that meditation training designed to increase healthcare providers' mindfulness skills is a promising and potentially sustainable way to address this problem. Emerging evidence suggests that mindfulness practice can reduce the provider contribution to healthcare disparities through several mechanisms including: reducing the likelihood that implicit biases will be activated in the mind, increasing providers' awareness of and ability to control responses to implicit biases once activated, increasing self-compassion and compassion toward patients, and reducing internal sources of cognitive load (e.g., stress, burnout, and compassion fatigue). Mindfulness training may also have advantages over current approaches to addressing implicit bias because it focuses on the development of skills through practice, promotes a nonjudgmental approach, can circumvent resistance some providers feel when directly confronted with evidence of racism, and constitutes a holistic approach to promoting providers' well-being. We close with suggestions for how a mindfulness approach can be practically implemented and identify potential challenges and research gaps to be addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.005

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mindfulness may improve patient care and patient safety.

    “Several theory papers and a recent review have been published discussing the potential for mindfulness and mindfulness-based interventions to improve HCP burnout and work, including findings that mindfulness may improve patient care and patient safety.22–27”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burgess, D. J., Beach, M. C., & Saha, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Burgess, Diana J.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
372-376
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2518908671
Cited by
182
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
16.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
mindfulness training, implicit bias, racial and ethnic bias, health care disparities, clinician bias, meditation, self-compassion, compassion fatigue, burnout, cognitive load, provider well-being, racism in healthcare
MeSH terms
Compassion Fatigue, Attitude of Health Personnel, Burnout, Professional, Emotions, Empathy, Health Personnel, Humans, Prejudice, Bias, Meditation, Healthcare Disparities, Racism, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review