The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Controlling Deuterium Isotope Effects in Comparative Proteomics
Abstract
This paper focuses on identifying structural features responsible for resolution of heavy isotope coded peptides during reversed-phase chromatography. This was achieved by using labeled coding agents that varied in structure, number of deuterium atoms, placement of deuterium in the coding agent, and the functional group targeted by the reagent. Six coding agents were examined. Deuterated versions of the coding agents studied included succinic anhydride-2H4, acetic acid 2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl ester-2H3, propionic acid 2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl ester-2H5, pentanoic acid 2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl ester-2H9, [3-(2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yloxycarbonyl)-propyl]-trimethylammonium chloride-2H9, and the commercial ICAT-2H8 reagent. It was found that these labeling agents vary widely in both their absolute and relative contribution to the chromatographic isotope effect. Relative effects were evaluated by normalizing resolution for the number of deuterium atoms in the derivatized peptide. The single, most dominant effect was the placement of deuterium atoms relative to hydrophilic functional groups in the coding agent. It was concluded that the probability of a deuterium atom interacting with the stationary phase of a reversed-phase chromatography (RPC) column and impacting resolution is greatly diminished by placing it adjacent to a hydrophilic group, as explained by solvophobic theory. But peptide size and coding agent size were also seen to correlate inversely with the magnitude of the isotope effect. This effect was explained as being due to the relative size of the coding agent versus that of the coding agent-peptide conjugate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dayon, L., Hainard, A., Licker, V., Turck, N., Kuhn, K., Hochstrasser, D. F., Burkhard, P. R., & Sanchez, J.-C. (2008) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac702422x · Cited by 561
A novel strategy for quantitative proteomics using isotope‐coded protein labels
Schmidt, A., Kellermann, J., & Lottspeich, F. (2005) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200400873 · Cited by 507
Current trends in quantitative proteomics
Elliott, M. H., Smith, D. S., Parker, C. E., & Borchers, C. (2009) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.1692 · Cited by 271
Boersema, P. J., Aye, T. T., van Veen, T. A. B., Heck, A. J. R., & Mohammed, S. (2008) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200800297 · Cited by 220
Metabolic Labeling of Proteins for Proteomics
Beynon, R. J., & Pratt, J. M. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r400010-mcp200 · Cited by 205
Thompson, A., Wölmer, N., Koncarevic, S., Selzer, S., Böhm, G., Legner, H., Schmid, P., Kienle, S., Penning, P., Höhle, C., et al. (2019) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04474 · Cited by 186
XL-MS: protein cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry
Holding, A. N. (2015) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.06.010 · Cited by 107
Meyer, J. G., D’Souza, A. K., Sorensen, D. J., Rardin, M. J., Wolfe, A. J., Gibson, B. W., & Schilling, B. (2016) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1007/s13361-016-1476-z · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, R., Sioma, C. S., Thompson, R. A., Xiong, L., & Regnier, F. E.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-07-04
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3662-3669
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1965155369
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.