The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Commercially Available Personal Glucose Meters for Portable Quantification of DNA
Open accessAbstract
DNA detection is commonly used in molecular biology, pathogen analysis, genetic disorder diagnosis, and forensic tests. While traditional methods for DNA detection such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA microarrays have been well developed, they require sophisticated equipment and operations, and thus it is still challenging to develop a portable and quantitative DNA detection method for the public use at home or in the field. Although many other techniques and devices have been reported to make the DNA detection simple and portable, very few of them are currently accessible to the public for quantitative DNA detection because of either the requirement of laboratory-based instrument or lack of quantitative detection. Herein we report application of personal glucose meters (PGMs), which are widely available, low cost, and simple to use, for quantitative detection of DNA, including a hepatitis B virus DNA fragment. The quantification is based on target-dependent binding of cDNA-invertase conjugate with the analyte DNA, thereby transforming the concentration of DNA in the sample into glucose through invertase-catalyzed hydrolysis of sucrose. Instead of amplifying DNA strands through PCR, which is vulnerable to contaminations commonly encountered for home and field usage, we demonstrate here signal amplifications based on enzymatic turnovers, making it possible to detect 40 pM DNA using PGM that can detect glucose only at the mM level. The method also shows excellent selectivity toward single nucleotide mismatches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanostructures in Biodiagnostics
Rosi, N. L., & Mirkin, C. A. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030067f · Cited by 4,603
Drummond, T. G., Hill, M. G., & Barton, J. K. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt873 · Cited by 2,214
Zhang, J., Song, S., Zhang, L., Wang, L., Wu, H., Pan, D., & Fan, C. (2006) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja061521a · Cited by 424
Signal Amplification by Allosteric Catalysis
Zhu, L., & Anslyn, E. V. (2006) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200501476 · Cited by 151
Overview on self-monitoring of blood glucose
Montagnana, M., Caputo, M., Giavarina, D., & Lippi, G. (2009) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2009.01.002 · Cited by 116
Cited by
McConnell, E. M., Cozma, I., Mou, Q., Brennan, J. D., Lu, Y., & Li, Y. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00240f · Cited by 477
Self-citationThe Era of Digital Health: A Review of Portable and Wearable Affinity Biosensors
Tu, J., Torrente‐Rodríguez, R. M., Wang, M., & Gao, W. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201906713 · Cited by 357
Yan, L., Zhu, Z., Zou, Y., Huang, Y., Liu, D., Jia, S., Xu, D., Wu, M., Zhou, Y., Zhou, S., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja3114714 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiang, Y., & Lu, Y.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-02-06
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1975-1980
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2111939469
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Commercially Available Personal Glucose Meters for Portable Quantification of DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac203014s
- The paper
- Xiang, Y., & Lu, Y. (2012). Using Commercially Available Personal Glucose Meters for Portable Quantification of DNA. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac203014s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.