The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymeric Systems for Bioprinting
Abstract
Bioprinting is rapidly being adopted as a major method for fabricating tissue engineering constructs. Through the precise deposition of cell- and bioactive molecule-laden materials, bioprinting offers researchers a means to create biological constructs with enhanced spatial complexity that more closely mimics native tissue. The vast majority of materials used in bioprinting have been polymers due to their suitability toward resembling the cellular environment and the variety of methods available to process polymeric systems in ambient or relatively mild chemical and environmental conditions. In this review, we will discuss in detail the wide variety of natural and synthetic polymers that have been employed as inks in bioprinting. We will review recent bioprinting innovations, such as increasing architectural complexity and cell viability in heterogeneous tissue constructs, which allow for the investigation of biological questions that could not be addressed before. We will also survey nascent fields of study that promise to further advance the development of novel biofabrication technologies in the field, such as 4D bioprinting and the inclusion of nanomaterials. To conclude, we will examine some of the necessary steps that must take place to bring this technology to commercial markets and facilitate its use in clinical therapies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges
Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 · Cited by 8,431
Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels
Yue, K., Trujillo-de Santiago, G., Alvarez, M. M., Tamayol, A., Annabi, N., & Khademhosseini, A. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 · Cited by 3,146
Sydney Gladman, A., Matsumoto, E. A., Nuzzo, R. G., Mahadevan, L., & Lewis, J. A. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4544 · Cited by 3,027
On the mechanisms of biocompatibility
Williams, D. F. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.023 · Cited by 2,772
Polymeric systems for controlled drug release
Uhrich, K. E., Cannizzaro, S. M., Langer, R. S., & Shakesheff, K. M. (1999) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr940351u · Cited by 2,633
Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels
Nichol, J. W., Koshy, S. T., Bae, H., Hwang, C. M., Yamanlar, S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064 · Cited by 2,377
Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury
Bradbury, E. J., Moon, L. D. F., Popat, R. J., King, V. R., Bennett, G. S., Patel, P. N., Fawcett, J. W., & McMahon, S. B. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416636a · Cited by 2,357
Light-induced shape-memory polymers
Lendlein, A., Jiang, H., Jünger, O., & Langer, R. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03496 · Cited by 2,006
25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication
Malda, J., Visser, J., Melchels, F. P., Jüngst, T., Hennink, W. E., Dhert, W. J. A., Groll, J., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302042 · Cited by 1,901
3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart
Lee, A., Hudson, A. R., Shiwarski, D. J., Tashman, J. W., Hinton, T. J., Yerneni, S., Bliley, J. M., Campbell, P. G., & Feinberg, A. W. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav9051 · Cited by 1,782
Cited by
Fabrication of Biomedical Scaffolds Using Biodegradable Polymers.
Kirillova, A., Yeazel, T. R., Asheghali, D., Petersen, S. R., Dort, S., Gall, K., & Becker, M. L. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01200 · Cited by 368
Advances and prospects in biomimetic multilayered scaffolds for articular cartilage regeneration
Fu, L., Yang, Z., Gao, C., Li, H., Yuan, Z., Wang, F., Sui, X., Liu, S., & Guo, Q. (2020) · Regenerative Biomaterials · doi:10.1093/rb/rbaa042 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Bedell, M. L., Navara, A. M., Du, Y., Zhang, S., & Mikos, A. G.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-05-29
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 10744-10792
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W3031288032
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymeric Systems for Bioprinting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00834
- The paper
- Bedell, M. L., Navara, A. M., Du, Y., Zhang, S., & Mikos, A. G. (2020). Polymeric Systems for Bioprinting. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00834
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.