The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selecting CO2 Sources for CO2 Utilization by Environmental-Merit-Order Curves
Abstract
Capture and utilization of CO2 as alternative carbon feedstock for fuels, chemicals, and materials aims at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and fossil resource use. For capture of CO2, a large variety of CO2 sources exists. Since they emit much more CO2 than the expected demand for CO2 utilization, the environmentally most favorable CO2 sources should be selected. For this purpose, we introduce the environmental-merit-order (EMO) curve to rank CO2 sources according to their environmental impacts over the available CO2 supply. To determine the environmental impacts of CO2 capture, compression and transport, we conducted a comprehensive literature study for the energy demands of CO2 supply, and constructed a database for CO2 sources in Europe. Mapping these CO2 sources reveals that CO2 transport distances are usually small. Thus, neglecting transport in a first step, we find that environmental impacts are minimized by capturing CO2 first from chemical plants and natural gas processing, then from paper mills, power plants, and iron and steel plants. In a second step, we computed regional EMO curves considering transport and country-specific impacts for energy supply. Building upon regional EMO curves, we identify favorable locations for CO2 utilization with lowest environmental impacts of CO2 supply, so-called CO2 oases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
An overview of CO2 capture technologies
MacDowell, N., Florin, N., Buchard, A., Hallett, J., Galindo, A., Jackson, G., Adjiman, C. S., Williams, C. K., Shah, N., & Fennell, P. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c004106h · Cited by 1,636
Air as the renewable carbon source of the future: an overview of CO2 capture from the atmosphere
Goeppert, A., Czaun, M., Surya Prakash, G. K., & Olah, G. A. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21586a · Cited by 724
Power-to-What?-environmental assessment of energy storage systems
Sternberg, A., & Bardow, A. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee03051f · Cited by 459
Self-citationvon der Assen, N., & Bardow, A. (2014) · Green Chem. · doi:10.1039/c4gc00513a · Cited by 399
Self-citationEnergy and Climate Impacts of Producing Synthetic Hydrocarbon Fuels from CO 2
van der Giesen, C., Kleijn, R., & Kramer, G. J. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es500191g · Cited by 162
Life Cycle Inventory of CO2 in an Enhanced Oil Recovery System
Jaramillo, P., Griffin, W. M., & McCoy, S. T. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es902006h · Cited by 159
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02342a · Cited by 4,374
Self-citationKlankermayer, J., Wesselbaum, S., Beydoun, K., & Leitner, W. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201507458 · Cited by 856
Climate change mitigation potential of carbon capture and utilization in the chemical industry
Kätelhön, A., Meys, R., Deutz, S., Suh, S., & Bardow, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1821029116 · Cited by 643
Self-citationTechnical photosynthesis involving CO2 electrolysis and fermentation
Haas, T., Krause, R., Weber, R., Demler, M., & Schmid, G. (2018) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-017-0005-1 · Cited by 649
Trends in CO2 conversion and utilization: A review from process systems perspective
Rafiee, A., Rajab Khalilpour, K., Milani, D., & Panahi, M. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2018.08.065 · Cited by 435
Advances in the Design of Heterogeneous Catalysts and Thermocatalytic Processes for CO2 Utilization
De, S., Dokania, A., Ramirez, A., & Gascon, J. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c04273 · Cited by 355
Life cycle assessment of CO 2 -based C1-chemicals
Sternberg, A., Jens, C. M., & Bardow, A. (2017) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c6gc02852g · Cited by 212
Self-citationLife Cycle Assessment of Power-to-Gas: Syngas vs Methane
Sternberg, A., & Bardow, A. (2016) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00644 · Cited by 148
Self-citationCombustion versus gasification in power- and biomass-to-x processes: an exergetic analysis
Mucci, S., Mitsos, A., & Bongartz, D. (2024) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c05549 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- von der Assen, N., Müller, L. J., Steingrube, A., Voll, P., & Bardow, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-01-11
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1093-1101
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2234905474
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 18.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
