Cited by 114Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

Identification of Novel Hydrogen-Substituted Polyfluoroalkyl Ether Sulfonates in Environmental Matrices near Metal-Plating Facilities

Open access
Lin, Yongfeng, Ruan, Ting, Liu, Aifeng, Jiang, Guibin·2017·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Environmental occurrence and behaviors of 6:2 chlorinated polyfluoroalkyl ether sulfonate (Cl-6:2 PFESA, with trade name F-53B) have been receiving increased attention recently. Nevertheless, its potential fates under diversified conditions remain concealed. In this study, susceptibility of Cl-6:2 PFESA to reductive dehalogenation was tested in an anaerobic super-reduced cyanocobalamin assay. A rapid transformation of dosed Cl-6:2 PFESA was observed, with a hydrogen-substituted polyfluoroalkyl ether sulfonate (1H-6:2 PFESA) identified as the predominant product by a nontarget screening workflow. With the aid of laboratory-purified standards, hydrogen-substituted PFESA analogues (i.e., 1H-6:2 and 1H-8:2 PFESA) were further found in river water and sediment samples collected from two separate regions near metal-plating facilities. Geometric mean concentrations of 560 pg/L (river water) and 11.1 pg/g (sediment) for 1H-6:2 PFESA and 11.0 pg/L (river water) and 7.69 pg/g (sediment) for 1H-8:2 PFESA were measured, and both analytes consisted average compositions of 1% and 0.1% among the 18 monitored per- and polyfluoroalkyl sulfonate and carboxylate pollutants, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first to report existence of polyfluoroalkyl sulfonates with both hydrogen and ether functional group in the environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.7b02961

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, Y., Ruan, T., Liu, A., & Jiang, G.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Ruan, Ting
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2017-09-27
Volume
51
Issue
20
Pages
11588-11596
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2755869645
Cited by
114
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional knowledge base (Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences OpenIR (Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21361140359, 21577151, 21621064, 21622705)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
reductive dehalogenation, river pollution, sediment contamination, non-target screening, environmental occurrence
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Ether, Ethers, Fluorocarbons, Hydrogen, Metals, Water Pollutants, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review