Cited by 85Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

De Novo Molecule Design Through the Molecular Generative Model Conditioned by 3D Information of Protein Binding Sites

Open access
Xu, Mingyuan, Ran, Ting, Chen, Hongming·2021·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

molecule design through the molecular generative model has gained increasing attention in recent years. Here, a novel generative model was proposed by integrating the three-dimensional (3D) structural information of the protein binding pocket into the conditional RNN (cRNN) model to control the generation of drug-like molecules. In this model, the composition of the protein binding pocket is effectively characterized through a coarse-grain strategy and the 3D information of the pocket can be represented by the sorted eigenvalues of the Coulomb matrix (EGCM) of the coarse-grained atoms composing the binding pocket. In current work, we used our EGCM method and a previously reported binding pocket descriptor, DeeplyTough, to train cRNN models and evaluated their performance. It has been shown that the model trained with the constraint of protein environment information has a clear tendency on generating compounds with higher similarity to the original X-ray-bound ligand than the normal RNN model and also better docking scores. Our results demonstrate the potential application of the controlled generative model for the targeted molecule generation and guided exploration on the drug-like chemical space.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01494

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, M., Ran, T., & Chen, H.
Affiliations
Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Hongming
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2021-07-01
Volume
61
Issue
7
Pages
3240-3254
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W3121082297
Cited by
85
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Xtal Pi Inc.
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
de novo molecule design, conditional generative models, protein binding sites, protein pockets, Coulomb matrix, coarse-grained representation, drug-like molecules, chemical space exploration
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Proteins, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review