The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive Mechanism of CO2 Electroreduction toward Ethylene and Ethanol: The Solvent Effect from Explicit Water–Cu(100) Interface Models
Abstract
This work presents the comprehensive CO 2 electroreduction mechanism toward ethylene and ethanol on a Cu(100) surface using density functional theory simulations in an explicit solvent model. The comprehensive mechanism includes all possible pathways that were established by accounting for solvent–intermediate interactions, structural energy variations due to water dynamics, and unguaranteed global minimum structures in explicit solvent models, resulting in several favorable alternative pathways. Due to the similarity of the ethylene and ethanol distribution and the overpotentials obtained from CO 2 electroreduction and CO electroreduction on the Cu(100) surface, in this work, the CO 2 to CO reduction step was excluded, and the presented mechanisms began with the CO adsorption step. The results suggest that *CO–*CO coupling is the most kinetically favored type of coupling. However, when the *CO concentration increases, the C–C coupling step can be altered to *CO–*CHO or *CO–*COH coupling and be more kinetically inhibited. The dissociation of the C–O bond is important because it can separate the pathways leading toward ethylene, and it was found to be substantially favored with intermediates in which the carbon atom binding to the oxygen atom is fully hydrogenated. The breaking of the C–O bond in a very late intermediate, that is, *CH 2 CH 2 OH, is feasible, which may create a major challenge to tune the selectivity toward ethylene or ethanol. The bifurcation of the ethylene and ethanol pathways occurs at late protonation steps, and the key intermediates that separate the pathways were identified. Furthermore, this work provides theoretical insights into how water affects the energy barriers of C–C coupling, C–O bond dissociation, and the stability of key intermediates. The results offer a comprehensive mechanism that provides guidance on tuning ethylene and ethanol selectivity and an in-depth understanding of the solvent effect on the intermediate species involved in CO 2 electroreduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte
Nitopi, S., Bertheussen, E., Scott, S. B., Liu, X., Engstfeld, A. K., Horch, S., Seger, B., Stephens, I. E. L., Chan, K., Hahn, C., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 · Cited by 5,223
How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels
Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J., & Nørskov, J. K. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00071j · Cited by 3,784
New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces
Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21234j · Cited by 3,160
What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes?
De Luna, P., Hahn, C., Higgins, D., Jaffer, S. A., Jaramillo, T. F., & Sargent, E. H. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav3506 · Cited by 3,052
A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels
Qiao, J., Liu, Y., Hong, F., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60323g · Cited by 2,990
Advances and challenges in understanding the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels
Birdja, Y. Y., Pérez-Gallent, E., Figueiredo, M. C., Göttle, A. J., Calle-Vallejo, F., & Koper, M. T. M. (2019) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0450-y · Cited by 2,747
Activity Descriptors for CO 2 Electroreduction to Methane on Transition-Metal Catalysts
Peterson, A. A., & Nørskov, J. K. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz201461p · Cited by 1,667
Electrocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methane and Methanol on Transition Metal Surfaces
Kuhl, K. P., Hatsukade, T., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N., Kibsgaard, J., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja505791r · Cited by 1,649
Theoretical Considerations on the Electroreduction of CO to C 2 Species on Cu(100) Electrodes
Calle‐Vallejo, F., & Koper, M. T. M. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201301470 · Cited by 941
Electric Field Effects in Electrochemical CO 2 Reduction
Chen, L. D., Urushihara, M., Chan, K., & Nørskov, J. K. (2016) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b02299 · Cited by 702
Cited by
Chang, B., Pang, H., Raziq, F., Wang, S., Huang, K.-W., Ye, J., & Zhang, H. (2023) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee00964e · Cited by 458
Yan, T., Chen, X., Kumari, L., Lin, J., Li, M., Fan, Q., Chi, H., Meyer, T. J., Zhang, S., & Ma, X. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00514 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Santatiwongchai, J., Faungnawakij, K., & Hirunsit, P.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-07-19
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 9688-9701
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3186539686
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive Mechanism of CO2 Electroreduction toward Ethylene and Ethanol: The Solvent Effect from Explicit Water–Cu(100) Interface Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscatal.1c01486
- The paper
- Santatiwongchai, J., Faungnawakij, K., & Hirunsit, P. (2021). Comprehensive Mechanism of CO2 Electroreduction toward Ethylene and Ethanol: The Solvent Effect from Explicit Water–Cu(100) Interface Models. ACS Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c01486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.