Cited by 280Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsHydrogen Storage and Materials

High-Performance Electrocatalysis for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Using Se-Doped Pyrite-Phase Nickel Diphosphide Nanostructures

Zhuo, Junqiao, Cabán-Acevedo, Miguel, Liang, Hanfeng, Samad, Leith, Ding, Qi, Fu, Yongping, Li, Meixian, Jin, Song·2015·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

The study of efficient, robust, and earth-abundant electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is essential for hydrogen-based energy technologies. Previous works have demonstrated that pyrite-structure materials (e.g., CoS 2, NiSe 2 ) are efficient HER catalysts. Here, we first systematically investigate the nanostructure synthesis of a series of pyrite-phase nickel phosphoselenide materials—NiP 2, Se-doped NiP 2 (NiP 1.93 Se 0.07 ), P-doped NiSe 2 (NiP 0.09 Se 1.91 ), and NiSe 2 —through a facile thermal conversion of Ni(OH) 2 nanoflakes. The similar nanostructures enable a systematic and fair comparison of their structural properties and catalytic activities for HER. We found that NiP 1.93 Se 0.07 shows the best HER performance, followed by NiP 2, NiP 0.09 Se 1.91, and NiSe 2 . Se-doped NiP 2 grown on carbon fiber paper can achieve an electrocatalytic current density of 10 mA cm –2 at an overpotential as low as 84 mV and a small Tafel slope of 41 mV decade –1 . This study not only estabilishes Se-doped NiP 2 as a competitive HER catalyst, but also demonstrates that doping or alloying of developed catalysts (especially doping with anions from another group; e.g., selenium to phosphorus) can improve the HER catalytic activity, which provides a general strategy to improve catalytic efficiencies of existing electrocatalysts for HER.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.5b01657

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhuo, J., Cabán-Acevedo, M., Liang, H., Samad, L., Ding, Q., Fu, Y., Li, M., & Jin, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin−Madison, 1101 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Meixian
  • Jin, Song
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2015-09-29
Volume
5
Issue
11
Pages
6355-6361
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2301205591
Cited by
280
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 25
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE-FG02-09ER46664)
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21275010)
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalysis, NiP2, selenium doping, NiSe2, thermal conversion, nanostructures, carbon paper, anion doping, alloying, earth-abundant catalysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review