Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum Mechanical Screening of Single-Atom Bimetallic Alloys for the Selective Reduction of CO2 to C1 Hydrocarbons

Open access
Cheng, Mu-Jeng, Clark, Ezra L., Pham, Hieu H., Bell, Alexis T., Head-Gordon, Martin·2016·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Electrocatalytic reduction of CO 2 to energy-rich hydrocarbons such as alkanes, alkenes, and alcohols is a very challenging task. So far, only copper has proven to be capable of such a conversion. We report density functional theory (DFT) calculations combined with the Poisson–Boltzmann implicit solvation model to show that single-atom alloys (SAAs) are promising electrocatalysts for CO 2 reduction to C 1 hydrocarbons in aqueous solution. The majority component of the SAAs studied is either gold or silver, in combination with isolated single atoms, M (M = Cu, Ni, Pd, Pt, Co, Rh, and Ir), replacing surface atoms. We envision that the SAA behaves as a one-pot tandem catalyst: first gold (or silver) reduces CO 2 to CO, and the newly formed CO is then captured by M and is further reduced to C 1 hydrocarbons such as methane or methanol. We studied 28 SAAs, and found about half of them selectively favor the CO 2 reduction reaction over the competing hydrogen evolution reaction. Most of those promising SAAs contain M = Co, Rh, or Ir. The reaction mechanism of two SAAs, Rh@Au(100) and Rh@Ag(100), is explored in detail. Both of them reduce CO 2 to methane but via different pathways. For Rh@Au(100), reduction occurs through the pathway *CO → *CHO → *CHOH → *CH + H 2 O ( l ) → *CH 2 + H 2 O ( l ) → *CH 3 + H 2 O ( l ) → * + H 2 O ( l ) + CH 4( g ); whereas, for Rh@Ag(100), the pathway is *CO → *CHO → *CH 2 O→ *OCH 3 → *O + CH 4( g ) → *OH + CH 4( g ) → * + H 2 O ( l ) + CH 4( g ) . The minimum applied voltages to drive the two electrocatalytic systems are −1.01 and −1.12 V RHE for Rh@Au(100) and Rh@Ag(100), respectively, at which the Faradaic efficiencies for CO 2 reduction to CO are 60% for gold and 90% for silver. This suggests that SAA can efficiently reduce CO 2 to methane with as small as 40% loss to the hydrogen evolution reaction for Rh@Au(100) and as small as 10% for Rh@Ag(100). We hope these computational results can stimulate experimental efforts to explore the use of SAA to catalyze CO 2 electrochemical reduction to hydrocarbons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.6b01393

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, M.-J., Clark, E. L., Pham, H. H., Bell, A. T., & Head-Gordon, M.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2016-10-17
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
7769-7777
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2522872739
Cited by
233
References
15
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.