Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 578

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Facile Ammonia Synthesis from Electrocatalytic N2 Reduction under Ambient Conditions on N-Doped Porous Carbon

Liu, Yanming, Su, Yan, Quan, Xie, Fan, Xinfei, Chen, Shuo, Yu, Hongtao, Zhao, Huimin, Zhang, Yaobin, Zhao, Jijun·2018·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Ammonia has been used in important areas such as agriculture and clean energy. Its synthesis from the electrochemical reduction of N 2 is an attractive alternative to the industrial method that requires high temperature and pressure. Currently, electrochemical N 2 fixation has suffered from slow kinetics due to the difficulty of N 2 adsorption and N≡N cleavage. Here, N-doped porous carbon (NPC) is reported as a cost-effective electrocatalyst for ammonia synthesis from electrocatalytic N 2 reduction under ambient conditions, where its N content and species were tuned to enhance N 2 chemical adsorption and N≡N cleavage. The resulting NPC was effective for fixing N 2 to ammonia with a high ammonia production rate (1.40 mmol g –1 h –1 at −0.9 V vs RHE). Experiments combined with density functional theory calculations revealed pyridinic and pyrrolic N were active sites for ammonia synthesis and their contents were crucial for promoting ammonia production on NPC. The energy-favorable pathway for ammonia synthesis was *N≡N → *NH═NH → *NH 2 –NH 2 → 2NH 3 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.7b02165

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Y., Su, Y., Quan, X., Fan, X., Chen, S., Yu, H., Zhao, H., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, J.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2018-01-17
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
1186-1191
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2781713722
Cited by
578
References
32
FWCI
21.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.