Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 591

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 126 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanistic Understanding of CO2 Reduction Reaction (CO2RR) Toward Multicarbon Products by Heterogeneous Copper-Based Catalysts

Todorova, Tanya K., Schreiber, Moritz W., Fontecave, Marc·2020·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

In the recent years, significant progress has been made toward designing active and selective catalysts for electrochemical CO 2 reduction, with particular interest focused on the two major C2 products—ethylene and ethanol. Numerous efforts have been made to enhance the understanding of the heterogeneous copper-based CO 2 reduction mechanisms by computational studies. Here we provide a critical assessment of various proposed scenarios of the initial and post C–C coupling steps that result in either ethylene or ethanol. In silico rationalization of the parameters controlling the product selectivity, such as the catalyst structure and composition (Cu facets, the presence of defective sites and/or subsurface oxygen atoms, or the interplay with a second metal) and the reaction conditions (pH, applied potential, and electrolyte), is provided. A comprehensive scheme combining the proposed pathways is derived, and the issues that are still under debate and require further investigations are highlighted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.9b04746

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 126 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Todorova, T. K., Schreiber, M. W., & Fontecave, M.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2019-12-30
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
1754-1768
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998357754
Cited by
591
References
126
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.