Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Design strategies for markedly enhancing energy efficiency in the electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction

Lai, Wenchuan, Qiao, Yan, Zhang, Jiawei, Lin, Zhiqun, Huang, Hongwen·2022·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

The review summarizes the recent strategies to improve energy efficiency of CO 2 electroreduction, a guiding metric for industrial application and economic feasibility, with emphasis on designing remarkable catalyst and advanced electrolysis system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d2ee00472k

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Metadata

Authors
Lai, W., Qiao, Y., Zhang, J., Lin, Z., & Huang, H.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2022
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
3603-3629
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W4285221145
Cited by
373
References
26
FWCI
13.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design strategies for markedly enhancing energy efficiency in the electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/d2ee00472k
The paper
Lai, W., Qiao, Y., Zhang, J., Lin, Z., & Huang, H. (2022). Design strategies for markedly enhancing energy efficiency in the electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ee00472k

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.