Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Morphology and mechanism of highly selective Cu(II) oxide nanosheet catalysts for carbon dioxide electroreduction

Open access
Wang, Xingli, Klingan, Katharina, Klingenhof, Malte, Möller, Tim, Ferreira de Araújo, Jorge, Martens, Isaac, Bagger, Alexander, Jiang, Shan, Rossmeisl, Jan, Dau, Holger, Strasser, Peter·2021·Nature Communications

Abstract

Cu oxides catalyze the electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR) to hydrocarbons and oxygenates with favorable selectivity. Among them, the shape-controlled Cu oxide cubes have been most widely studied. In contrast, we report on novel 2-dimensional (2D) Cu(II) oxide nanosheet (CuO NS) catalysts with high C 2+ products, selectivities (> 400 mA cm−2) in gas diffusion electrodes (GDE) at industrially relevant currents and neutral pH. Under applied bias, the (001)-orientated CuO NS slowly evolve into highly branched, metallic Cu 0 dendrites that appear as a general dominant morphology under electrolyte flow conditions, as attested by operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy and in situ electrochemical transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Millisecond-resolved differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) track a previously unavailable set of product onset potentials. While the close mechanistic relation between CO and C 2 H 4 was thereby confirmed, the DEMS data help uncover an unexpected mechanistic link between CH 4 and ethanol. We demonstrate evidence that adsorbed methyl species, *CH 3, serve as common intermediates of both CH 3 H and CH 3 CH 2 OH and possibly of other CH 3-R products via a previously overlooked pathway at (110) steps adjacent to (100) terraces at larger overpotentials. Our mechanistic conclusions challenge and refine our current mechanistic understanding of the CO 2 electrolysis on Cu catalysts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-20961-7

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Wang, X., Klingan, K., Klingenhof, M., Möller, T., Ferreira de Araújo, J., Martens, I., Bagger, A., Jiang, S., Rossmeisl, J., Dau, H., & Strasser, P.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2021-02-04
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
794-794
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3126772863
Cited by
373
References
66
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphology and mechanism of highly selective Cu(II) oxide nanosheet catalysts for carbon dioxide electroreduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-021-20961-7
The paper
Wang, X., Klingan, K., Klingenhof, M., Möller, T., Ferreira de Araújo, J., Martens, I., Bagger, A., Jiang, S., Rossmeisl, J., Dau, H., & Strasser, P. (2021). Morphology and mechanism of highly selective Cu(II) oxide nanosheet catalysts for carbon dioxide electroreduction. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20961-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.