The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Evaluation of Peptidomimetic Modifications in a Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Model Epitope: A Framework for Immunogenic Antigen Design
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT Peptide-based cancer vaccines offer a promising strategy to target tumor-specific neoantigens. This approach is increasingly critical as post-translationally modified peptides, driven by altered tumor metabolism, emerge as a unique class of neoantigens. Because these chemically distinct epitopes cannot be genetically encoded by mRNA or viral platforms, synthetic peptide vaccines are poised to be the primary route to target these types of neoantigens. Yet, their clinical translation is restricted by poor metabolic stability, limited intracellular permeability, and structural requirements for MHC-I binding and T cell receptor (TCR) recognition. Although peptidomimetic modifications have been widely explored to improve pharmacokinetics, their impact on antigen presentation and immune recognition remains poorly understood. Here, we undertook a comprehensive evaluation of peptidomimetics geared at MHC-I neoantigens and generated a diverse library of systematically modified peptides that incorporate backbone N -methylation, peptoid substitution, and stereochemical inversion. Integrated assays revealed a highly position-dependent tolerance to peptidomimetic modifications, while subsequent combinatorial designs demonstrated non-additive effects on the balance between immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics. Collectively, these findings establish design principles and provide a framework for balancing immune recognition with enhanced stability and permeability in peptidomimetic antigen design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peptide-Based Vaccines: Current Progress and Future Challenges
Malonis, R. J., Lai, J. R., & Vergnolle, O. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00472 · Cited by 602
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 98
- 10.1038/nri3084 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nri1245 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaa4971 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.052 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-019-50738-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-022-01464-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41392-022-01270-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/2051013614525375 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrd2224 · DOI
- 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318233e5b2 · DOI
- 10.3389/fonc.2021.663264 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature22991 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/annonc/mdu211 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00262-008-0540-3 · DOI
- Ohno S., 2012, Anticancer Res., 32, 2263
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2169 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40262-013-0079-0 · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.1c00016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/intimm/9.11.1701 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.addr.2025.115675 · DOI
- 10.1111/cbdd.12055 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41392-022-00904-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.it.2016.08.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00778 · DOI
- 10.1038/nri3254 · DOI
- 10.1038/32183 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.192.12.1685 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.20020161 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02442589 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2021.637963 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tips.2023.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.02.006 · DOI
- 10.1021/jm0102147 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12079-018-0492-0 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsomega.4c02604 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsomega.1c06964 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.340160309 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0407677102 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12545 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.91.21.9765 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0161-5890(97)00004-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/jm9509511 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102543 · DOI
- 10.1021/cb500888q · DOI
- 10.1021/jm000909s · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M102772200 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.175.6.3810 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/15384047.2025.2486141 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/jacs.3c05300 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acschembio.2c00403 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.152.6.2890 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.270.44.26057 · DOI
- 10.1097/00002371-200001000-00015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.04.019 · DOI
- 10.1093/intimm/10.2.159 · DOI
- Ettouati L., 1996, Pept Res., 9, 248
- 10.1016/S0196-9781(02)00148-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.274.15.10227 · DOI
- 10.1002/psc.311 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.167.10.5852 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.1400800 · DOI
- 10.1021/acschembio.0c00218 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01140 · DOI
- 10.3390/md19060311 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.06.006 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42004-026-01898-8 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.150.7.2724 · DOI
- 10.1038/346476a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90020-F · DOI
- 10.1002/eji.1830210915 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-1759(93)90210-X · DOI
- 10.1016/j.vetimm.2012.08.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)36925-X · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2479 · DOI
- 10.1002/eji.1830221028 · DOI
- 10.1021/acspolymersau.2c00036 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja00052a076 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0968-0896(01)00434-5 · DOI
- 10.1529/biophysj.106.095208 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI91512 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.88.9.3972 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.89.13.6020 · DOI
- 10.1101/2025.11.06.687013 · DOI
- 10.1021/acschembio.4c00312 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-026-68717-5 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0708254105 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01162 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9367 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.04.074 · DOI
- 10.1021/acschembio.5b00189 · DOI
- 10.1039/C4MD00409D · DOI
- 10.1016/j.peptides.2005.06.015 · DOI
- 10.1021/ar8000603 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/ph15101283 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00726-005-0289-3 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Newkirk, S. E., Kelly, J. J., Hourn, N., Bhandari, S., Spencer, N., & Pires, M. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pires, Marcos M.
- Venue
- ACS Chemical Biology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2026-05-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1533-1546
- ISSN
- 1554-8929 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-8937
- PMC
- PMC13288458
- OpenAlex
- W7162420473
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Chemical Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM124893)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Keywords
- peptidomimetics, MHC class I epitopes, methylation, stereochemical inversion, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, combinatorial designs, peptide stability, peptide permeability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review