Cited by 134Protein Degradation and InhibitorsHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Development of Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) Degraders Recruiting Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) E3 Ubiquitin Ligase

Open access
Yang, Ka, Wu, Hao, Zhang, Zhongrui, Leisten, Eric D., Nie, Xueqing, Liu, Binkai, Wen, Zhi, Zhang, Jing +2 more·2020·ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Abstract

Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) is involved in multiple cellular processes such as aggresome formation, protein stability, and cell motility. Numerous HDAC6-selective inhibitors have been developed as cellular chemical tools to elucidate the function of HDAC6. Since HDAC6 has multiple domains that cannot be studied by HDAC6-selective inhibitors, CRISPR-CAS9 and siRNA/shRNA have been employed to elucidate the nonenzymatic functions of HDAC6. However, these genetic methods have many limitations. Proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) is an emerging technology for the development of small molecules that can quickly remove the entire protein in cells. We previously developed multifunctional HDAC6 degraders that can recruit cereblon (CRBN) E3 ubiquitin ligase. These HDAC6 degraders can degrade not only HDAC6 but also neo-substrates of CRBN. They are excellent candidates for the development of anticancer therapeutics, but the multifunctional nature of the CRBN-based HDAC6 degraders has limited their utility as specific chemical probes for the study of HDAC6-related cellular pathways. Herein we report the development of the first cell-permeable HDAC6-selective degraders employing Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) E3 ubiquitin ligase, which does not have any known neo-substrates. The DC 50 ’s of the most potent compound 3j are 7.1 nM and 4.3 nM in human MM1S and mouse 4935 cell lines, respectively. The D max ’s of 3j in these two cell lines are 90% and 57%, respectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00046

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • STAT3 protein degradation can be achieved more efficiently and sustainably than technologies that use STAT3 mRNA.

    “First, STAT3 protein degradation can be achieved more efficiently and sustainably than technologies that use STAT3 mRNA with the characteristic of rapid degradation (50, 51).”

    From Small-molecule PROTAC mediates targeted protein degradation to treat STAT3-dependent epithelial cancer (2022) · cites this paper as [50]

    The paper’s Abstract describes PROTACs as inducing efficient, rapid protein degradation with potentially sustained downstream effects, and presents them as an alternative to siRNA/shRNA. Its experiments concern HDAC6, however; it does not establish that STAT3 degradation is more efficient or sustainable than STAT3 mRNA-targeting technologies. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CRBN-based PROTACs recruiting a pan-HDAC inhibitor AB3 or HDAC6 selective binder nexturastat A resulted in specific degradation of HDAC6.

    “CRBN-based PROTACs recruiting a pan-HDAC inhibitor AB3 or a HDAC6 selective binder nexturastat A resulted in specific degradation of HDAC6.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, K., Wu, H., Zhang, Z., Leisten, E. D., Nie, X., Liu, B., Wen, Z., Zhang, J., Cunningham, M. D., & Tang, W.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Tang, Weiping
Venue
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
Published
2020-03-18
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
575-581
ISSN
1948-5875 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011548650
Cited by
124
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (???R01 CA152108???)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
HDAC6, PROTACs, VHL E3 ubiquitin ligase, chemical probes, MM.1S cells, aggresome formation, anticancer agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review