Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Ultralocalized Cas13a Assay Enables Universal and Nucleic Acid Amplification-Free Single-Molecule RNA Diagnostics

Tian, Tian, Shu, Bowen, Jiang, Yongzhong, Ye, Miaomiao, Liu, Lei, Guo, Zhonghui, Han, Zeping, Wang, Zhang, Zhou, Xiaoming·2021·ACS Nano

Abstract

Existing methods for RNA diagnostics, such as reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR), mainly rely on nucleic acid amplification (NAA) and RT processes, which are known to introduce substantial issues, including amplification bias, cross-contamination, and sample loss. To address these problems, we introduce a confinement effect-inspired Cas13a assay for single-molecule RNA diagnostics, eliminating the need for NAA and RT. This assay involves confining the RNA-triggered Cas13a catalysis system in cell-like-sized reactors to enhance local concentrations of target and reporter simultaneously, via droplet microfluidics. It achieves >10 000-fold enhancement in sensitivity when compared to the bulk Cas13a assay and enables absolute digital single-molecule RNA quantitation. We experimentally demonstrate its broad applicability for precisely counting microRNAs, 16S rRNAs, and SARS-CoV-2 RNA from synthetic sequences to clinical samples with excellent accuracy. Notably, this direct RNA diagnostic technology enables detecting a wide range of RNA molecules at the single-molecule level. Moreover, its simplicity, universality, and excellent quantification capability might render it to be a dominant rival to RT-qPCR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsnano.0c08165

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Tian, T., Shu, B., Jiang, Y., Ye, M., Liu, L., Guo, Z., Han, Z., Wang, Z., & Zhou, X.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2020-12-17
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1167-1178
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W3111292947
Cited by
328
References
43
FWCI
11.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.