Cited by 79Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsIndustrial Gas Emission Control

Plastic Waste Product Captures Carbon Dioxide in Nanometer Pores

Open access
Algozeeb, Wala A., Savas, Paul E., Yuan, Zhe, Wang, Zhe, Kittrell, Carter, Hall, Jacklyn N., Chen, Weiyin, Bollini, Praveen +1 more·2022·ACS Nano

Abstract

Plastic waste (PW) and increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels are among the top environmental concerns presently facing humankind. With an ambitious 2050 zero-CO 2 emissions goal, there is a demand for economical CO 2 capture routes. Here we show that the thermal treatment of PW in the presence of potassium acetate yields an effective carbon sorbent with pores width of 0.7–1.4 nm for CO 2 capture. The PW to carbon sorbent process works with single or mixed streams of polyolefin plastics. The CO 2 capacity of the sorbent at 25 °C is 17.0 ± 1.1 wt % (3.80 ± 0.25 mmol g –1 ) at 1 bar and 5.0 ± 0.6 wt % (1.13 ± 0.13 mmol g –1 ) at 0.15 bar, and it regenerates upon reaching 75 ± 5 °C. The CO 2 capture cost from flue gas via this technology is estimated to be <$21 ton –1 CO 2, much lower than competing CO 2 capture technologies. Hence, this PW-derived carbon material should find utility in the capture of CO 2 from point sources of high CO 2 emissions while providing a use for otherwise deleterious PW.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsnano.2c00955

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among the compared activating agents, potassium acetate demonstrated the best performance for porous carbon generation, while KOH effectively creates pores but can cause excessive plastic decomposition and reduce porous carbon yield.

    “while KOH effectively creates pores, it can cause excessive plastic decomposition, reducing porous carbon yield; sodium acetate and lithium acetate have limited impact on yield; potassium acetate (KOAc) demonstrated the best performance for porous carbon generation [108] .”

    From Functional carbon materials from waste plastics: synthesis and applications (2025) · cites this paper as [108]

    The Synthesis and characterization of the sorbent section says KOAc performed best among the tested agents. It acknowledges KOH's reported effectiveness for activated-carbon synthesis generally, but says that with plastic waste, KOH caused complete decomposition without forming porous carbon—not merely a reduced yield. The same section says sodium and lithium acetates produced complete decomposition or only trace yields, rather than having a limited impact on yield. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Flash Joule heating cannot control the graphene layer.

    “Although flash Joule heating cannot control the graphene layer, it can quickly and effectively convert mixed waste plastics into graphene within a few seconds, and the carbon yield of graphene is higher than that of chemical vapor deposition, reaching 20-30 wt% (Algozeeb et al. 2022).”

    From Conversion of waste plastics into value-added carbon materials (2023) · cites this paper as Algozeeb et al. 2022

  • The carbon yield of graphene from flash Joule heating is higher than that from chemical vapor deposition, reaching 20-30 wt%.

    “Although flash Joule heating cannot control the graphene layer, it can quickly and effectively convert mixed waste plastics into graphene within a few seconds, and the carbon yield of graphene is higher than that of chemical vapor deposition, reaching 20-30 wt% (Algozeeb et al. 2022).”

    From Conversion of waste plastics into value-added carbon materials (2023) · cites this paper as Algozeeb et al. 2022

  • Flash Joule heating can quickly and effectively convert mixed waste plastics into graphene within a few seconds.

    “Although flash Joule heating cannot control the graphene layer, it can quickly and effectively convert mixed waste plastics into graphene within a few seconds, and the carbon yield of graphene is higher than that of chemical vapor deposition, reaching 20-30 wt% (Algozeeb et al. 2022).”

    From Conversion of waste plastics into value-added carbon materials (2023) · cites this paper as Algozeeb et al. 2022

  • Among different plastics, polyethylene terephthalate and polyvinyl chloride are more likely to produce porous carbon than polyethylene and polypropylene.

    “Among different plastics, plastics such as polyethylene terephthalate and polyvinyl chloride are more likely to produce porous carbon than polyethylene and polypropylene (Algozeeb et al. 2022).”

    From Conversion of waste plastics into value-added carbon materials (2023) · cites this paper as Algozeeb et al. 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rochelle, G. T. Amine Scrubbing for CO2 Capture. Science 2009, 325, 1652-1654.
  2. Cocca, M.; Di Pace, E.; Errico, M. E.; Gentile, G.; Montarsolo, A.; Mossotti, R., Eds. Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp 99-106.
  3. National Academies of Sciences, E.; Medicine, Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2019; p 510.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Algozeeb, W. A., Savas, P. E., Yuan, Z., Wang, Z., Kittrell, C., Hall, J. N., Chen, W., Bollini, P., & Tour, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Rice University (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Tour, James M.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2022-04-05
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
7284-7290
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W4225533613
Cited by
79
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Saudi Aramco
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-F0031794)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
Keywords
plastic waste, CO2 capture, carbon adsorbents, potassium acetate, heat treatment, polyolefins, flue gas, adsorbent regeneration, CO2 capture cost, waste valorization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review