Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward Sustainability for Recovery of Critical Metals from Electronic Waste: The Hydrochemistry Processes

Open access
Sun, Z., Cao, H., Xiao, Y., Sietsma, J., Jin, W., Agterhuis, H., Yang, Y.·2017·ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Abstract

Critical metals are significantly important in the preparation of high-tech materials associated with applications on, e.g., renewable energy, sustainable materials engineering and cleaner production. This importance together with supply risk to a substantial extent within the European Union (EU) has pushed their recovery from waste being highlighted. Electronic waste, usually from end-of-life electronic products, is a notable secondary resource for this purpose because of its distinctive features. A range of critical metals, including rare-earth metals, indium, cobalt and valuable metals, such as copper, silver and gold, are possibly recovered from electronic waste. On top of the current practices of electronic waste recycling, it requires innovations on technology and breakthroughs on process design in order to promote critical metal recovery or electronic waste treatment (in general) to be green and sustainable. Significant potentials are more and more noticed from hydrochemistry (metallurgy) technologies (processes) that contribute to this development because of its flexibility, relatively high recovery rate and extraction selectivity of critical metals, and possibilities of eliminating secondary waste. In this review, critical evaluation is carried out on the aspects of (1) understanding the features of different hydrochemistry processes for recycling of (critical) metals from electronic waste; (2) identifying the difficulties for a process to be implemented into industrial application which still originate from the high complexity of electronic waste and the secondary waste generation, e.g., wastewater; (3) defining circulability of metals to be recovered and recognizing their potentials to zero waste scheme. According to the evaluation, sustainable even zero waste processing is expected to be achieved for electronic waste treatment in the long term that it is preferred to reduce or prevent the generation of electronic waste and improve material efficiency from the whole life cycle of electronic products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00841

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Sun, Z., Cao, H., Xiao, Y., Sietsma, J., Jin, W., Agterhuis, H., & Yang, Y.
Venue
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Published
2016-09-27
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
21-40
ISSN
2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2519957158
Cited by
259
References
3
FWCI
34.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Sustainability for Recovery of Critical Metals from Electronic Waste: The Hydrochemistry Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00841
The paper
Sun, Z., Cao, H., Xiao, Y., Sietsma, J., Jin, W., Agterhuis, H., & Yang, Y. (2017). Toward Sustainability for Recovery of Critical Metals from Electronic Waste: The Hydrochemistry Processes. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00841

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.