Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recombinant Protein-co-PEG Networks as Cell-Adhesive and Proteolytically Degradable Hydrogel Matrixes. Part II: Biofunctional Characteristics

Rizzi, Simone C., Ehrbar, Martin, Halstenberg, Sven, Raeber, George P., Schmoekel, Hugo G., Hagenmüller, Henri, Müller, Ralph, Weber, Franz E., Hubbell, Jeffrey A.·2006·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

We present here the biological performance in supporting tissue regeneration of hybrid hydrogels consisting of genetically engineered protein polymers that carry specific features of the natural extracellular matrix, cross-linked with reactive poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). Specifically, the protein polymers contain the cell adhesion motif RGD, which mediates integrin receptor binding, and degradation sites for plasmin and matrix-metalloproteinases, both being proteases implicated in natural matrix remodeling. Biochemical assays as well as in vitro cell culture experiments confirmed the ability of these protein-PEG hydrogels to promote specific cellular adhesion and to exhibit degradability by the target enzymes. Cell culture experiments demonstrated that proteolytic sensitivity and suitable mechanical properties were critical for three-dimensional cell migration inside these synthetic matrixes. In vivo, protein-PEG matrixes were tested as a carrier of bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) to heal critical-sized defects in a rat calvarial defect model. The results underscore the importance of fine-tuning material properties of provisional therapeutic matrixes to induce cellular responses conducive to tissue repair. In particular, a lack of rhBMP or insufficient degradability of the protein-PEG matrix prevented healing of bone defects or remodeling and replacement of the artificial matrix. This work confirms the feasibility of attaining desired biological responses in vivo by engineering material properties through the design of single components at the molecular level. The combination of polymer science and recombinant DNA technology emerges as a powerful tool for the development of novel biomaterials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bm060504a

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Rizzi, S. C., Ehrbar, M., Halstenberg, S., Raeber, G. P., Schmoekel, H. G., Hagenmüller, H., Müller, R., Weber, F. E., & Hubbell, J. A.
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2006-10-03
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
3019-3029
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W2177880129
Cited by
193
References
4
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.