Cited by 89Osteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans researchLubricants and Their Additives

Normal and Shear Interactions between Hyaluronan–Aggrecan Complexes Mimicking Possible Boundary Lubricants in Articular Cartilage in Synovial Joints

Open access
Seror, Jasmine, Merkher, Yulia, Kampf, Nir, Collinson, Lisa, Day, Anthony J., Maroudas, Alice, Klein, Jacob·2012·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

Using a surface force balance, normal and shear interactions have been measured between two atomically smooth surfaces coated with hyaluronan (HA), and with HA/aggrecan (Agg) complexes stabilized by cartilage link protein (LP). Such HA/Agg/LP complexes are the most abundant mobile macromolecular species permeating articular cartilage in synovial joints and have been conjectured to be present as boundary lubricants at its surface. The aim of the present study is to gain insight into the extremely efficient lubrication when two cartilage surfaces slide past each other in healthy joints, and in particular to elucidate the possible role in this of the HA/Agg/LP complexes. Within the range of our parameters, our results reveal that the HA/Agg/LP macromolecular surface complexes are much better boundary lubricants than HA alone, likely because of the higher level of hydration, due to the higher charge density, of the HA/Agg/LP layers with respect to the HA alone. However, the friction coefficients (μ) associated with the mutual interactions and sliding of opposing HA/Agg/LP layers (μ ≈ 0.01 up to pressure P of ca. 12 atm, increasing sharply at higher P) suggest that such complexes by themselves cannot account for the remarkable boundary lubrication observed in mammalian joints (up to P > 50 atm).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bm301283f

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The major macromolecules (HA, Agg, lubricin) thought to be implicated in cartilage lubrication do not, when measured directly as boundary lubricants in SFB experiments, lead to friction coefficients anywhere near as low as those observed between healthy cartilage at physiological pressures.

    “Thus we conclude that, to date, the major macromolecules (HA, Agg, lubricin) thought to be implicated in cartilage lubrication do not, when measured directly as boundary lubricants in SFB experiments, lead to friction coefficients anywhere near as low as those observed between healthy cartilage at physiological pressures.”

    From Hydration lubrication (2013) · cites this paper as [122]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Even for Agg molecules rubbing against each other at lower pressures, friction coefficient is at least ten-fold higher than seen in articular cartilage.

    “However, even for Agg molecules rubbing against each other at the lower pressures, the friction coefficient is at least ten-fold higher than seen in for articular cartilage.”

    From Hydration lubrication (2013) · cites this paper as [122]

    The Results report friction of μ = 0.014 ± 0.004 for the Agg-bearing layers up to about 12 atm, and the Conclusions give μ ≈ 0.001–0.005 as characteristic of synovial joint lubrication. The source supports higher friction at lower pressures, but not an unqualified ‘at least ten-fold’ difference: 0.014 is less than ten times 0.005. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Friction coefficient between two HA-coated surfaces is rather high (≈0.3) already at quite low pressures.

    “Friction forces as a function of the load, shown as empty triangles and stars in Fig. 18, indicate a rather high friction coefficient ( ≈ 0.3) between two such HA-coated surfaces already at quite low pressures.”

    From Hydration lubrication (2013) · cites this paper as [122]

    The Results report high friction between two avidin–HA-coated surfaces, but give μ = 0.4 ± 0.05, not ≈0.3. They describe this as occurring from about 2 atm, while the Discussion says friction is weak below about 3 atm and rises rapidly with further compression. Thus the magnitude and low-pressure characterization do not fully match. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • At higher pressures (above ca. 15 atm), friction coefficient increases, possibly due to greater bridging likelihood.

    “At higher pressures -from above ca. 15 atm in the study by Seror et al. -the friction coefficient increases as shown, possibly due to a greater bridging likelihood.”

    From Hydration lubrication (2013) · cites this paper as [122]

    The Results report that friction rises under stronger compression, reaching μ ≈ 0.1 at about 16 atm. The Discussion suggests increased interpenetration of opposing aggrecan layers at higher pressures, but does not specifically attribute this rise to a greater likelihood of bridging; its explicit discussion of bridges concerns HA layers. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Seror et al. reconstructed HA and HA/agg complex onto mica surfaces in SFB and measured boundary lubrication.

    “In a series of papers, Seror et al. [121, 122] reconstructed both HA and, separately, the HA/agg complex onto the mica surfaces in the SFB, and measured the resulting boundary lubrication, as summarized in Fig. 18.”

    From Hydration lubrication (2013) · cites this paper as [122]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Dowson D.; Yao J. Proc. 16th Leeds–Lyon Symp. Tribol. 1990, 17, 91– 102.
  2. Schmidt T. A.; Gastelum N. S.; Nguyen Q. T.; Schumacher B. L.; Sah R. L. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 56, 882– 891. 17328061
  3. McCutchen C. W. Wear 1962, 5, 1– 17.
  4. Klein J. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J 2006, 220, 691– 710.
  5. Hills B. A.; Butler B. D. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1984, 43, 641– 648. 6476922 PMC1001427
  6. Ateshian G. A.; Wang H.; Lai W. M. J. Tribol. 1998, 120, 241– 251.
  7. McCutchen C. W. Nature 1959, 184, 1284– 1285. 26219114
  8. Chang D. P.; Abu-Lail N. I.; Coles J. M.; Guilak F.; Jay G. D.; Zauscher S. Soft Matter 2009, 5, 3438– 3445. 20936046 PMC2951324
  9. Chang D. P.; Abu-Lail N. I.; Guilak F.; Jay G. D.; Zauscher S. Langmuir 2008, 24, 1183– 1193. 18181652
  10. Gale L. R.; Chen Y.; Hills B. A.; Crawford R. Acta Orthop. 2007, 78, 309– 314. 17611842
  11. Hills B. A. Intern. Med. J. 2002, 32, 242– 251. 12036223
  12. Schwarz I. M.; Hills B. A. Br. J. Rheumatol. 1998, 37, 21– 26. 9487246
  13. Swann D. A.; Radin E. L.; Nazimiec M.; Weisser P. A.; Curran N.; Lewinnek G. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1974, 33, 318– 326. 4415649 PMC1006265
  14. Swann D. A.; Slayter H. S.; Silver F. H. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256, 5921– 5925. 7240180
  15. Yu J.; Urban J. P. G. J. Anat. 2010, 216, 533– 541. 20148992 PMC2849531
  16. Hills B. A. J. Rheumatol. 1989, 16, 82– 91. 2716011
  17. Raviv U.; Klein J. Science 2002, 297, 1540– 1543. 12202826
  18. Chen M.; Briscoe W. H.; Armes S. P.; Klein J. Science 2009, 323, 1698– 1701. 19325108
  19. Raviv U.; Giasson S.; Kampf N.; Gohy J. F.; Jerome R.; Klein J. Nature 2003, 425, 163– 165. 12968175
  20. Goldberg R.; Schroeder A.; Silbert G.; Turjerman K.; Barenholz Y.; Klein J. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3517– 3521. 21728188
  21. Wen S.; Huang P. Principles of Tribology; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2012.
  22. Goldberg R.; Schroeder A.; Barenholz Y.; Klein J. Biophys. J. 2011, 100, 2403– 2411. 21575574 PMC3093555
  23. Ogston A. G.; Stanier J. E. J. Physiol. 1953, 119, 244– 252. 13035748 PMC1392794
  24. Fouissac E.; Milas M.; Rinaudo M. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 6945– 6951.
  25. Richette P.; Ravaud P.; Conrozier T.; Euller-Ziegler L.; Mazieres B.; Maugars Y.; Mulleman D.; Clerson P.; Chevalier X. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60, 824– 830. 19248105
  26. Radin E. L.; Swann D. A.; Weisser P. A. Nature 1970, 228, 377– &. 5473985
  27. Zappone B.; Ruths M.; Greene G. W.; Jay G. D.; Israelachvili J. N. Biophys. J. 2007, 92, 1693– 1708. 17142292 PMC1796837
  28. Hills B. A.; Crawford R. W. J. Arthroplasty 2003, 18, 499– 505. 12820095
  29. Hills B. A. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1995, 23, 112– 115. 7605048
  30. Hills B. A. Intern. Med. J. 2002, 32, 170– 178. 11951930
  31. Faraday Discuss. 2012, 156, 295- 6.
  32. Briscoe B. J.; Evans D. C. B. Proc. R. Soc. London., Series A 1982, 380, 389– 407.
  33. Maroudas A.; Bayliss M. T.; Venn M. F. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1980, 39, 514– 523. 7436585 PMC1000596
  34. Dudhia J. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 2241– 2256. 16143826 PMC11139155
  35. Ng L. J. Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Engineering Thesis, University of California, 2005.
  36. Ng L.; Grodzinsky A. J.; Patwari P.; Sandy J.; Plaas A.; Ortiz C. J. Struct. Biol. 2003, 143, 242– 257. 14572479
  37. Doege K. J.; Sasaki M.; Kimura T.; Yamada Y. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 894– 902. 1985970
  38. Dean D.; Seog J.; Ortiz C.; Grodzinsky A. J. Langmuir 2003, 19, 5526– 5539.
  39. Hascall V. C.; Sajdera S. W. J. Biol. Chem. 1970, 245, 4920– 4930. 5506265
  40. Hardingham T. E.; Fosang A. J. FASEB J. 1992, 6, 861– 870. 1740236
  41. Watanabe H.; Cheung S. C.; Itano N.; Kimata K.; Yamada Y. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 28057– 28065. 9346959
  42. Seyfried N. T.; McVey G. F.; Almond A.; Mahoney D. J.; Dudhia J.; Day A. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 5435– 5448. 15590670
  43. Seror J.; Merkher Y.; Kampf N.; Collinson L.; Day A. J.; Maroudas A.; Klein J. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 3432– 3443. 21823600
  44. Klein J.; Kumacheva E. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 6996– 7009.
  45. Klein J. J. Chem. Society, Faraday Trans. 1 1983, 79, 99– &.
  46. Mahoney D. J.; Blundell C. D.; Day A. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 22764– 22771. 11287417
  47. Israelachvili J. Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 2nd ed.; Accademic Press: London, 1992.
  48. Han L.; Dean D.; Mao P.; Ortiz C.; Grodzinsky A. J. Biophys. J. 2007, 93, L23– L25. 17586571 PMC1948065
  49. Darst S. A.; Ahlers M.; Meller P. H.; Kubalek E. W.; Blankenburg R.; Ribi H. O.; Ringsdorf H.; Kornberg R. D. Biophys. J. 1991, 59, 387– 396. 1901232 PMC1281155
  50. Klein J.; Raviv U.; Perkin S.; Kampf N.; Chai L.; Giasson S. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2004, 16, S5437– S5448.
  51. Raviv U.; Tadmor R.; Klein J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 8125– 8134.
  52. Cotton F. A.; Wilkinson G.; Murillo C. A.; Bochmann M. Advanced Inorganic Chemistry; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1999.
  53. Raviv U.; Giasson S.; Kampf N.; Gohy J. F.; Jerome R.; Klein J. Langmuir 2008, 24, 8678– 8687. 18642855
  54. Benz M.; Chen N. H.; Israelachvili J. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2004, 71A, 6– 15. 15368250
  55. Tadmor R.; Chen N. H.; Israelachvili J. N. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 61, 514– 523. 12115441
  56. Yu J.; Banquy X.; Greene G. W.; Lowrey D. D.; Israelachvili J. N. Langmuir 2012, 28, 2244– 2250. 22148857
  57. Minassian A.; O’Hare D.; Parker K. H.; Urban J. P. G.; Warensjo K.; Winlove C. P. J. Orthop. Res. 1998, 16, 720– 725. 9877397
  58. Han L.; Dean D.; Ortiz C.; Grodzinsky A. J. Biophys. J. 2007, 92, 1384– 1398. 17142289 PMC1783866
  59. Zelenay P.; Ricejackson L. M.; Wieckowski A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1990, 283, 389– 401.
  60. Faraday Discuss. 2012, 156, 293.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seror, J., Merkher, Y., Kampf, N., Collinson, L., Day, A. J., Maroudas, A., & Klein, J.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • Wellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Klein, Jacob
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2012-11-01
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
3823-3832
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W2118691586
Cited by
89
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomacromolecules (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerstvo Průmyslu a Obchodu
  • Versus Arthritis (18472)
  • American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Lubricants and Their Additives
Keywords
hyaluronic acid, aggrecan, boundary lubrication, articular cartilage, synovial joints, friction coefficient, surface force balance, hydration, charge density
MeSH terms
Proteoglycan Link Protein, Animals, Cartilage, Articular, Cattle, Hyaluronic Acid, Joints, Lubrication, Proteoglycans, Stress, Mechanical, Surface Properties, Synovial Fluid, Synovial Membrane, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, Friction, Aggrecans, Lubricants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review