Cited by 30biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesPolymer composites and self-healing

Enzymatic Surface Erosion of High Tensile Strength Polycarbonates Based on Natural Phenols

Open access
Sommerfeld, Sven D., Zhang, Zheng, Costache, Marius C., Vega, Sebastián L., Kohn, Joachim·2014·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

Surface erosion has been recognized as a valuable design tool for resorbable biomaterials within the context of drug delivery devices, surface coatings, and when precise control of strength retention is critical. Here we report on high tensile strength, aromatic–aliphatic polycarbonates based on natural phenols, tyrosol (Ty) and homovanillyl alcohol (Hva), that exhibit enzymatic surface erosion by lipase. The Young’s moduli of the polymers for dry and fully hydrated samples are 1.0 to 1.2 GPa and 0.8 to 1.2 GPa, respectively. Typical characteristics of enzymatic surface erosion were confirmed for poly(tyrosol carbonate) films with concomitant mass-loss and thickness-loss at linear rates of 0.14 ± 0.01 mg cm–2 d–1 and 3.0 ± 0.8 μm d–1, respectively. The molecular weight and the mechanical properties of the residual films remained constant. Changing the ratio of Ty and Hva provided control over the glass transition temperature (Tg) and the enzymatic surface erosion: increasing the Hva content in the polymers resulted in higher Tg and lower enzymatic erosion rate. Polymers with more than 50 mol % Hva were stable at 37 °C in enzyme solution. Analysis on thin films using quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D) demonstrated that the onset temperature of the enzymatic erosion was approximately 20 °C lower than the wet Tg for all tested polymers. This new finding demonstrates that relatively high tensile strength polycarbonates can undergo enzymatic surface erosion. Moreover, it also sheds light on the connection between Tg and enzymatic degradation and explains why few of the high strength polymers follow an enzyme-meditated degradation pathway.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bm4016539

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ability of lipases to degrade polycarbonates in buffer has been linked to the glass transition temperature of the polymer.

    “Finally, the ability of lipases to degrade polycarbonates in buffer has been linked to the glass transition temperature of the polymer.513”

    From Catalysis as an Enabling Science for Sustainable Polymers (2018) · cites this paper as [513]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Heller J. J. Controlled Release 1985, 2, 167.
  2. Zhu K. J.; Hendren R. W.; Jensen K.; Pitt C. G. Macromolecules 1991, 24, 1736.
  3. Pitt C. G.; Hendren R. W.; Schindler A.; Woodward S. C. J. Controlled Release 1984, 1, 3.
  4. Williams D. F. Eng. Med. 1981, 10, 5.
  5. Eckert H.; Forster B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 894.
  6. Sauerbrey G. Z. Phys. 1959, 155, 206.
  7. Fox T. G. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 1956, 1, 123.
  8. Bedoui F.; Widjaja L. K.; Luk A.; Bolikal D.; Murthy N. S.; Kohn J. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 2230.
  9. Pego A. P.; Grijpma D. W.; Feijen J. Polymer 2003, 44, 6495.
  10. Keddie J. L.; Jones R. A. L.; Cory R. A. Europhys. Lett. 1994, 27, 59.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sommerfeld, S. D., Zhang, Z., Costache, M. C., Vega, S. L., & Kohn, J.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Rutgers − The State University of New Jersey , , 599 Taylor Road , , ,
Corresponding author
Kohn, Joachim
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2014-01-17
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
830-836
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W2013358347
Cited by
30
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomacromolecules (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rowan Digitals Works (Rowan University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P41EB001046)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
Keywords
polycarbonate, lipase, natural phenols, resorbable biomaterials, tensile strength, glass transition temperature, enzymatic degradation, QCM-D, drug delivery devices, surface coating
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Homovanillic Acid, Lipase, Phenylethyl Alcohol, Polycarboxylate Cement, Polyesters, Surface Properties, Temperature, Tensile Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review