Cited by 1,146biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

Why degradable polymers undergo surface erosion or bulk erosion

Burkersroda, Friederike von, Schedl, Luise, Göpferich, Achim·2002·Biomaterials

Abstract

A theoretical model was developed that allows to predict the erosion mechanism of water insoluble biodegradable polymer matrices. The model shows that all degradable polymers can undergo surface erosion or bulk erosion. Which way a polymer matrix erodes after all depends on the diffusivity of water inside the matrix, the degradation rate of the polymer's functional groups and the matrix dimensions. From these parameters the model allows to calculate for an individual polymer matrix a dimensionless 'erosion number' epsilon. The value of epsilon indicates the mode of erosion. Based on epsilon, a critical device dimension Lcritical can be calculated. If a matrix is larger than Lcritical it will undergo surface erosion, if not it will be bulk eroding. Lcritical values for polymers were estimated based on literature data. Polyanhydrides were found to be surface eroding down to a size of approximately Lcritical = 10(-4) m while poly(alpha-hydroxy esters) matrices need to be larger than Lcritical = 10(-1) m to lose their bulk erosion properties. To support our theoretical findings it was shown experimentally that poly(alpha-hydroxy ester) matrices, which are considered classical bulk eroding materials, can also undergo surface erosion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00170-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burkersroda, F. V., Schedl, L., & Göpferich, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Göpferich, Achim
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
23
Issue
21
Pages
4221-4231
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992801092
Cited by
1,146
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 54
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GO 565/3-2)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
biodegradable polymers, surface erosion, bulk erosion, water diffusion coefficient, polyanhydrides
MeSH terms
Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer, Biocompatible Materials, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Materials Testing, Mathematics, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Models, Theoretical, Polyesters, Polyglycolic Acid, Polymers, Water, Lactic Acid, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review