The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the Performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods. 1. The Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Open accessAbstract
The Molecular Mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MM/PBSA) and the Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/GBSA) methods calculate binding free energies for macromolecules by combining molecular mechanics calculations and continuum solvation models. To systematically evaluate the performance of these methods, we report here an extensive study of 59 ligands interacting with six different proteins. First, we explored the effects of the length of the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, ranging from 400 to 4800 ps, and the solute dielectric constant (1, 2, or 4) on the binding free energies predicted by MM/PBSA. The following three important conclusions could be observed: (1) MD simulation length has an obvious impact on the predictions, and longer MD simulation is not always necessary to achieve better predictions. (2) The predictions are quite sensitive to the solute dielectric constant, and this parameter should be carefully determined according to the characteristics of the protein/ligand binding interface. (3) Conformational entropy often show large fluctuations in MD trajectories, and a large number of snapshots are necessary to achieve stable predictions. Next, we evaluated the accuracy of the binding free energies calculated by three Generalized Born (GB) models. We found that the GB model developed by Onufriev and Case was the most successful model in ranking the binding affinities of the studied inhibitors. Finally, we evaluated the performance of MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA in predicting binding free energies. Our results showed that MM/PBSA performed better in calculating absolute, but not necessarily relative, binding free energies than MM/GBSA. Considering its computational efficiency, MM/GBSA can serve as a powerful tool in drug design, where correct ranking of inhibitors is often emphasized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Particle mesh Ewald: An N ⋅log( N ) method for Ewald sums in large systems
Darden, T., York, D., & Pedersen, L. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464397 · Cited by 30,546
Ryckaert, J.-P., Ciccotti, G., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (1977) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5 · Cited by 21,239
Development and testing of a general amber force field
Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A., & Case, D. A. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20035 · Cited by 19,506
Self-citationThe Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Bayly, C. I., Cieplak, P., Cornell, W., & Kollman, P. A. (1993) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100142a004 · Cited by 8,081
Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature
Andersen, H. C. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.439486 · Cited by 5,758
Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations
Wang, J., Wang, W., Kollman, P. A., & Case, D. A. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2005.12.005 · Cited by 5,477
Self-citationKollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978
Self-citationDuan, Y., Wu, C., Chowdhury, S., Lee, M. C., Xiong, G., Zhang, W., Yang, R., Cieplak, P., Luo, R., Lee, T., et al. (2003) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.10349 · Cited by 4,441
Self-citationOnufriev, A., Bashford, D., & Case, D. A. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20033 · Cited by 2,507
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Hou T. J., 2006, Plos Comput. Biol., 2, 46
- Wang J., 1999, Proteins, 34, 69, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990101)34:1<69::AID-PROT6>3.0.CO;2-C · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19990101)34:1<69::aid-prot6>3.0.co;2-c
- Bren U., 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 45, 1546, 10.1021/ci050151r · doi:10.1021/ci050151r
- Frisch M. J., 2004, Gaussian 03
- Giammona, D. A.An examination of conformational flexibility in porphyrin and bulky-ligand binding in myoglobin.Ph.D. thesis,University of California at Davis, 1984.
- Misra V. K., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 92, 4691, 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4691 · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.10.4691
Cited by
g_mmpbsa—A GROMACS Tool for High-Throughput MM-PBSA Calculations
Kumari, R., Kumar, R., Open Source Drug Discovery Consortium, & Lynn, A. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500020m · Cited by 4,882
Sun, H., Li, Y., Tian, S., Xu, L., & Hou, T. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp01388c · Cited by 738
Self-citationA Review on Applications of Computational Methods in Drug Screening and Design
Lin, X., Li, X., & Lin, X. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25061375 · Cited by 718
Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Drug Discovery and Pharmaceutical Development
Salo-Ahen, O. M. H., Alanko, I., Bhadane, R., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Honorato, R. V., Hossain, S., Juffer, A. H., Kabedev, A., Lahtela-Kakkonen, M., Larsen, A. S., et al. (2020) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9010071 · Cited by 659
Entropy-Enthalpy Compensation: Role and Ramifications in Biomolecular Ligand Recognition and Design
Chodera, J. D., & Mobley, D. L. (2013) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130318 · Cited by 531
Molecular dynamics simulations and novel drug discovery
Liu, X., Shi, D., Zhou, S., Liu, H., Liu, H., & Yao, X. (2018) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2018.1403419 · Cited by 518
Moal, I. H., & Fernández-Recio, J. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts489 · Cited by 281
The SARS-CoV-2 Spike variant D614G favors an open conformational state
Mansbach, R. A., Chakraborty, S., Nguyen, K., Montefiori, D. C., Korber, B., & Gnanakaran, S. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf3671 · Cited by 206
AB ‐Bind: Antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions
Sirin, S., Apgar, J. R., Bennett, E. M., & Keating, A. E. (2016) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2829 · Cited by 179
Bai, Q., Liu, S., Tian, Y., Xu, T., Banegas‐Luna, A. J., Pérez‐Sánchez, H., Huang, J., Liu, H., & Yao, X. (2022) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1581 · Cited by 156
Exploring the role of receptor flexibility in structure-based drug discovery
Feixas, F., Lindert, S., Sinko, W., & McCammon, J. A. (2014) · Biophysical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2013.10.007 · Cited by 156
Cheng, W., & Ng, C. A. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b01268 · Cited by 141
Kong, R., Liu, T., Zhu, X., Ahmad, S., Williams, A. L., Phan, A. T., Zhao, H., Scott, J. E., Yeh, L.-A., & Wong, S. T. C. (2014) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0395 · Cited by 90
In Silico Modeling and Scoring of PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complex Poses
Liao, J., Nie, X., Unarta, I. C., Ericksen, S. S., & Tang, W. (2022) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02155 · Cited by 62
Ng, N. H. J., Ghosh, S., Bok, C. M., Ching, C., Low, B. S. J., Chen, J. T., Lim, E., Miserendino, M. C., Tan, Y. S., Hoon, S., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48647-w · Cited by 57
Kar, P., Lipowsky, R., & Knecht, V. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp3085292 · Cited by 53
Wang, H.-T., Wang, Z.-L., Chen, K., Yao, M.-J., Zhang, M., Wang, R.-S., Zhang, J.-H., Ågren, H., Li, F.-D., Li, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42393-1 · Cited by 53
Promiscuous and specific recognition among ephrins and Eph receptors
Dai, D., Huang, Q., Nussinov, R., & Ma, B. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.07.002 · Cited by 51
Corrada, D., Denison, M. S., & Bonati, L. (2017) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c7mb00005g · Cited by 24
Curti, M., Maffeis, V., Teixeira Alves Duarte, L. G., Shareef, S., Hallado, L. X., Curutchet, C., & Romero, E. (2023) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4579 · Cited by 10
Main methods and tools for peptide development based on protein-protein interactions (PPIs)
Baeza, J., Bedoya, M., Cruz, P., Ojeda, P., Adasme-Carreño, F., Cerda, O., & González, W. (2025) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2025.151623 · Cited by 8
Tracing Potential Covalent Inhibitors of an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase through Target-Focused Modelling
Bjij, I., Ramharack, P., Khan, S., Cherqaoui, D., & Soliman, M. E. S. (2019) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules24173125 · Cited by 6
Baweja, L., & Wereszczynski, J. (2025) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-025-00635-0 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Hou, T., Wang, J., Li, Y., & Wang, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-11-30
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-82
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W2142868265
- Cited by
- 2,773
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 62.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.