Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 873

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Shape Evolution of Monolayer MoS2 Crystals Grown by Chemical Vapor Deposition

Wang, Shanshan, Rong, Youmin, Fan, Ye, Pacios, Mercè, Bhaskaran, Harish, He, Kuang, Warner, Jamie H.·2014·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Atmospheric-pressure chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is used to grow monolayer MoS 2 two-dimensional crystals at elevated temperatures on silicon substrates with a 300 nm oxide layer. Our CVD reaction is hydrogen free, with the sulfur precursor placed in a furnace separate from the MoO 3 precursor to individually control their heating profiles and provide greater flexibility in the growth recipe. We intentionally establish a sharp gradient of MoO 3 precursor concentration on the growth substrate to explore its sensitivity to the resultant MoS 2 domain growth within a relatively uniform temperature range. We find that the shape of MoS 2 domains is highly dependent upon the spatial location on the silicon substrate, with variation from triangular to hexagonal geometries. The shape change of domains is attributed to local changes in the Mo:S ratio of precursors (1:>2, 1:2, and 1:<2) and its influence on the kinetic growth dynamics of edges. These results improve our understanding of the factors that influence the growth of MoS 2 domains and their shape evolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm5025662

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 873

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S., Rong, Y., Fan, Y., Pacios, M., Bhaskaran, H., He, K., & Warner, J. H.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2014-11-04
Volume
26
Issue
22
Pages
6371-6379
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2316629727
Cited by
873
References
24
FWCI
21.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.