Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6,998

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Honeycomb Carbon: A Review of Graphene

Allen, Matthew J., Tung, Vincent C., Kaner, Richard B.·2010·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTHoneycomb Carbon: A Review of GrapheneMatthew J. Allen†, Vincent C. Tung‡, and Richard B. Kaner*†‡View Author Information Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and California NanoSystems Institute, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095†Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and California NanoSystems Institute.‡Department of Materials Science and Engineering and California NanoSystems Institute.Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1, 132–145Publication Date (Web):July 17, 2009Publication History Received20 February 2009Published online17 July 2009Published inissue 13 January 2010https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr900070dhttps://doi.org/10.1021/cr900070dreview-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2009 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views90502Altmetric-Citations6052LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Anode materials,Carbon,Deposition,Layers,Two dimensional materials Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cr900070d

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 6,998

Metadata

Authors
Allen, M. J., Tung, V. C., & Kaner, R. B.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2009-07-17
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
132-145
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2057330747
Cited by
6,998
References
12
FWCI
9.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.