Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biochar from the Straw-Stalk of Rapeseed Plant

Karaosmanoǧlu, Filiz, Işıḡıgür-Ergüdenler, Aslı, Sever, Aydın·2000·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

Agricultural residues are an important and inexpensive bioresource for energy production. In this study the slow pyrolysis technique has been applied to the straw and stalk of rapeseed plant, and the effects of temperature and heating rate on the yields and characteristics of the solid products (biochars) have been investigated. Experiments were performed in a tubular reactor under nitrogen atmosphere at constant heating rate (5 °C min - 1 ) and varying temperatures (400−900 °C) and at constant temperature (800 °C) and varying heating rates (5, 10, 15, °C min - 1 ). The biochars obtained are carbon rich, reactive, and relatively pollution-free potential solid biofuels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef9901138

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Karaosmanoǧlu, F., Işıḡıgür-Ergüdenler, A., & Sever, A.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2000-02-10
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
336-339
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W2068733733
Cited by
210
References
0
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.