Cited by 393Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

New trends in biochar pyrolysis and modification strategies: feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, sustainability concerns and implications for soil amendment

Open access
Wang, Liuwei, Ok, Yong Sik, Tsang, Daniel C. W., Alessi, Daniel S., Rinklebe, Jörg, Wang, Hailong, Mašek, Ondřej, Hou, Renjie +2 more·2020·Soil Use and Management

Abstract

As a waste‐derived soil amendment with a long history, biochar has received extensive attention for its capability to improve soil fertility/health; remove or immobilize contaminants in soil, water and air; and mitigate climate change. With the aim of producing engineered biochars with excellent performances, new trends in biochar pyrolytic production and modification strategies have emerged. This review critically summarizes novel pyrolysis methods (e.g., microwave‐assisted pyrolysis, co‐pyrolysis and wet pyrolysis) and modification approaches (e.g., mineral modification, photocatalytic modification, electrochemical modification) with a focus on (a) the mechanisms involved in environmental remediation processes including soil immobilization, contaminant adsorption and catalytic oxidation; (b) effects of feedstock and pyrolysis conditions on physicochemical properties; (c) sustainability considerations in novel modification and pyrolysis strategies; and (d) the feasibility of extrapolating the results from wastewater treatment to soil remediation. It is argued that in order to achieve the maximum net environmental benefits, ‘greener’ modification methods are warranted, and the risks associated with pyrolysis of contaminated feedstock in soil amendment and contaminant sorption can be minimized through various novel approaches (e.g., co‐pyrolysis). Furthermore, novel pyrolysis methods can be combined with emerging modification strategies to synthesize more ‘effective’ biochars. Considering the similar aims of modification (e.g., increase surface area, introduce oxygen‐containing functional groups, increase aromaticity), the applicability of several novel approaches could in future can be expanded from contaminant adsorption/degradation in aqueous media to soil remediation/fertility improvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sum.12592

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A high lignin content of the feedstock favors negative priming because the resulting biochar possesses higher aromatic moieties which are harder to metabolize than aliphatic ones.

    “A high lignin content of the feedstock also favors negative priming, because the resulting biochar should possess higher aromatic moieties which are much harder to be metabolized as compared with aliphatic ones (Wang et al. 2020g).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al. 2020g

  • Plant biomass feedstock renders lower ash content than animal waste or sludge feedstocks.

    “Plant biomass as the feedstock material renders a low ash content as compared with animal waste or sludge feedstocks (Wang et  al. 2020g).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al. 2020g

  • NH3 ambience pyrolysis is a simple way to introduce nitrogen-containing functional groups.

    “­ NH 3 ambience pyrolysis is also a simple way to introduce nitrogen-containing functional groups (Wang et al. 2020g).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al. 2020g

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, L., Ok, Y. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Alessi, D. S., Rinklebe, J., Wang, H., Mašek, O., Hou, R., O'Connor, D., & Hou, D.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Korea University (KR)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Wuppertal (DE)
  • Zhejiang A & F University (CN)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • School of Environment Tsinghua University Beijing China
Corresponding author
Hou, Deyi
Venue
Soil Use and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-30
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
358-386
ISSN
  • 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2743
OpenAlex
W3015782924
Cited by
393
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 34
FWCI
16.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Soil Use and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1801300)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
biochar, pyrolysis, biochar modification, soil amendment, soil remediation, co-pyrolysis, microwave pyrolysis, mineral modification, electrochemical modification, contaminant immobilization, pollutant adsorption, catalytic oxidation, feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, sustainability, soil fertility, wastewater treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review