Cited by 308Infection Control and VentilationIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation

Effect of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation on viral aerosols

Walker, Christopher M., Ko, GwangPyo·2007·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) germicidal air disinfection is an engineering method used to control the airborne transmission of pathogenic microorganisms in high-risk settings. Despite the recent emergence of respiratory viral pathogens such as SARS and avian influenza viruses, UV disinfection of pathogenic viral aerosols has not been examined. Hence, we characterized the UV disinfection of viral aerosols using the bacteriophage MS2, adenovirus, and coronavirus. Our objectives were to characterize the effect of nebulization and air sampling on the survival of important viral pathogens, quantitatively characterize and estimate the UV susceptibility of pathogenic viral aerosols, and evaluate the effect of relative humidity (RH) on the susceptibility of viral aerosols, to 254 nm UV-C. The viruses were aerosolized into an experimental chamber using a six-jet Collison nebulizer, exposed to 254 nm UV, and sampled using an AGI-30 liquid impinger. Both the MS2 and adenovirus aerosols were very resistant to UV air disinfection, with a reduction of less than 1 logarithm in viable viral aerosols at a UV dose of 2608 microW s/cm2. The susceptibility of coronavirus aerosols was 7-10 times that of the MS2 and adenovirus aerosols. Unlike bacterial aerosols, there was no significant protective effect of high RH on UV susceptibility of the tested viral aerosols. We confirmed that the UV disinfection rate differs greatly between viral aerosols and viruses suspended in liquid.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es070056u

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, C. M., & Ko, G.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Ko, GwangPyo
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2007-06-21
Volume
41
Issue
15
Pages
5460-5465
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W1969357301
Cited by
308
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Keywords
ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, UV-C disinfection, viral aerosols, airborne transmission, bacteriophage MS2, adenovirus, coronavirus, relative humidity, nebulization, SARS, avian influenza, airborne virus inactivation
MeSH terms
Aerosols, Disinfection, Humidity, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Ultraviolet Rays, Viruses, Levivirus, Coronavirus, Microbial Viability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review