CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Partitioning of Fluorotelomer Alcohols to Octanol and Different Sources of Dissolved Organic Carbon

Carmosini, Nadia, Lee, Linda S.·2008·Environmental Science & Technology
DOI 10.1021/es800263t
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Interest in the environmental fate of fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs) has spurred efforts to understand their equilibrium partitioning behavior. Experimentally determined partition coefficients for FTOHs between soil/water and air/water have been reported, but direct measurements of partition coefficients for dissolved organic carbon (DOC)/water (K(doc)) and octanol/ water(K(ow)) have been lacking. Here we measured the partitioning of 8:2 and 6:2 FTOH between one or more types of DOC and water using enhanced solubility or dialysis bag techniques, and also quantified K(ow) values for 4:2 to 8:2 FTOH using a batch equilibration method. The range in measured log K(doc) values for 8:2 FTOH using the enhanced solubility technique with DOC derived from two soils, two biosolids, and three reference humic acids is 2.00-3.97 with the lowest values obtained for the biosolids and an average across all other DOC sources (biosolid DOC excluded) of 3.54 +/- 0.29. For 6:2 FTOH and Aldrich humic acid, a log K(doc) value of 1.96 +/- 0.45 was measured using the dialysis technique. These average values are approximately 1 to 2 log units lower than previously indirectly estimated K(doc) values. Overall, the affinity for DOC tends to be slightly lower than that for particulate soil organic carbon. Measured log K(ow) values for 4:2 (3.30 +/- 0.04), 6:2 (4.54 +/- 0.01), and 8:2 FTOH (5.58 +/- 0.06) were in good agreement with previously reported estimates. Using relationships between experimentally…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es800263t

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 2002, Telomer Research Program Updates Presented to the USEPA OPPT, November 25, 2002
  2. Yarwood G., 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5756, 10.1021/es0708971 · DOI
  3. Russell M. H., 2008, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 800, 10.1021/es0710499 · DOI
  4. Prevedouros K., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 32, 10.1021/es0512475 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Liu, J.Environmental Fate of Fluorotelomer Alcohols and Esters in Soils. Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette,2007.
  6. Kannan K., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 4489, 10.1021/es0493446 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Tomy G. T., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 6475, 10.1021/es049620g · DOI
  8. Young C. J., 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 3455, 10.1021/es0626234 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Liu J., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 7535, 10.1021/es051125c · DOI · Paper page
  10. Liu J., 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5357, 10.1021/es070228n · DOI · Paper page
  11. Arp H. P. H., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 7298, 10.1021/es060744y · DOI · Paper page
  12. Goss K.-U., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 3572, 10.1021/es060004p · DOI · Paper page
  13. Thuens S., 2008, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 53, 223, 10.1021/je700522f · DOI
  14. Kaiser M. A., 2004, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 49, 912, 10.1021/je034222z · DOI
  15. Liu J., 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8024, 10.1021/es0708722 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lindsey M. E., 2000, Water Res., 34, 2385, 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00391-7 · DOI
  17. Freidig A. P., 1998, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 17, 998, 10.1002/etc.5620170604 · DOI
  18. McCarthy J. F., 1985, Org. Geochem., 8, 141, 10.1016/0146-6380(85)90074-9 · DOI
  19. Karickhoff S. W., 1979, Determination of octanol/water distribution coefficients, water solubilities, and sediment/water partition coefficients for hydrophobic organic pollutants
  20. Seol Y., 2000, Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1976, 10.2136/sssaj2000.6461976x · DOI
  21. Schlautman M. A., 1993, Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 961, 10.1021/es00042a020 · DOI
  22. Carter C. W., 1982, Environ. Sci. Technol., 16, 735, 10.1021/es00105a003 · DOI
  23. Lee C.-L., 2003, Water Res., 37, 4250, 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00309-9 · DOI
  24. Croué J.-P., 1999, Formation and Control of Disinfection By-Products in Drinking Water, 65
  25. Chiou C. T., 1986, Environ. Sci. Technol., 20, 502, 10.1021/es00147a010 · DOI
  26. Higuchi T., 1979, J. Pharm. Sci., 68, 1267, 10.1002/jps.2600681019 · DOI
  27. Schwarzenbach R. P., 2003, Environmental Organic Chemistry
  28. Chin Y.-P., 1997, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 1630, 10.1021/es960404k · DOI
  29. Gauthier T. D., 1987, Environ. Sci. Technol., 21, 243, 10.1021/es00157a003 · DOI
  30. Jota M. A. T., 1991, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 10, 483, 10.1002/etc.5620100408 · DOI
  31. McCarthy J. F., 1989, Chemosphere, 19, 1911, 10.1016/0045-6535(89)90014-3 · DOI
  32. Raber B., 1997, Euro. J. Soil. Sci., 48, 443, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00210.x · DOI
  33. Chin Y.-P., 1994, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1994, 1853, 10.1021/es00060a015 · DOI
  34. Urase T., 2003, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage., 5, 77, 10.1007/s101630300012 · DOI
  35. Goss K.-U., 2006, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 9518, 10.1021/jp062684o · DOI · Paper page
  36. Swales S., 2004, (14-C)-8−2 Telomer B Alcohol: adsorption/desorption using a batch equilibrium method.
  37. Niederer C., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 5374, 10.1021/es0602952 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carmosini, N., & Lee, L. S.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2008-07-25
Volume
42
Issue
17
Pages
6559-6565
ISSN
  • 0013-936X
  • 1520-5851
DOI
10.1021/es800263t
Cited by
46
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review