Cited by 113Polymer crystallization and propertiesbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly

Remarkable melting behavior of PLA stereocomplex in linear PLLA/PDLA blends

Shao, Jun, Xiang, Sheng, Bian, Xinchao, Sun, Jingru, Li, Gao, Chen, Xuesi·2015·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

The linear PLLA/PDLA blends were prepared by solution mixing method, and the melting behavior and structure evolution of neat PLLA and PLLA/PDLA specimens were investigated in this study. Results indicated that PLA stereocomplex crystallites (sc) preferentially formed in all blends, and the crystal structure of PLA sc and homochiral crystallites (hc) did not vary as molecular weights. The melting temperature of PLA neat specimens ( T hm ) increased monotonously with molecular weights. However, significantly different from the neat samples, the melting temperature of PLA sc ( T sc ) increased at first, then decreased as the molecular weight of polymers increased from 4 to 100 kg/mol. When the molecular weights of PLLA and PDLA ranged from 23 to 50 kg/mol, multimelting behaviors observed at 230 °C in the blends. After annealing at a fix temperature ( T sc – 10 °C), the highest T sc was observed at 249.9 °C in L32/D31 specimen, which was the highest report value until now. The WAXD and SAXS results attested that not crystal structure, but the variation of the thickness of lamellar crystal was the exterior reason, and the higher optical purity of PLLA and PDLA would be the inherent cause which resulted in the superior thermal properties. This investigation provides more potential for the application of PLA sc materials at higher temperature environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie504484b

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shao, J., Xiang, S., Bian, X., Sun, J., Li, G., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Gao
  • Chen, Xuesi
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2015-02-17
Volume
54
Issue
7
Pages
2246-2253
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2333551134
Cited by
113
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2011AA02A202)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51033003, 51073154, 51273198, 51303176, 51321062, 51373169, 51403089)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
Keywords
PLLA/PDLA blends, melting behavior, melting point, molecular weight effects, lamellar thickness, crystal structure, optical purity, annealing, polymer blends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review