Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decomposition of Formic Acid under Hydrothermal Conditions

Yu, Jianli, Savage, Phillip E.·1998·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

The thermal decomposition of formic acid was studied in dilute aqueous solutions and in the absence of added oxygen at temperatures between 320 and 500 °C and pressures between 178 and 303 atm for residence times between 1.4 and 80 s. Under these conditions, the formic acid conversion ranged from 38% to 100%, and the major products were always CO 2 and H 2, which indicates that decarboxylation is the preferred reaction path for formic acid decomposition under hydrothermal conditions. CO also appeared as a product, which shows that a dehydration path is available, but the CO yield was always at least an order of magnitude lower than the yields of CO 2 and H 2 . The kinetics of formic acid disappearance and product formation at temperatures above 320 °C are consistent with a reaction rate law that is first order in formic acid. The implications of the present results to the generally accepted molecular decomposition mechanism are discussed, as are the alternative free-radical, ionic, and surface-catalyzed reaction mechanisms proposed in the literature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie970182e

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Yu, J., & Savage, P. E.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
1998-01-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
2-10
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2046297419
Cited by
347
References
13
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.