Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 852

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Direct Fabrication and Harvesting of Monodisperse, Shape-Specific Nanobiomaterials

Rolland, Jason P., Maynor, Benjamin W., Euliss, Larken E., Exner, Ansley E., Denison, Ginger M., DeSimone, Joseph M.·2005·Journal of the American Chemical Society
DOI 10.1021/ja051977c
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A versatile "top-down" method for the fabrication of particles, Particle Replication In Nonwetting Templates (PRINT), is described which affords absolute control over particle size, shape, and composition. This technique is versatile and general enough to fabricate particles with a variety of chemical structures, yet delicate enough to be compatible with sophisticated biological agents. Using PRINT, we have fabricated monodisperse particles of poly(ethylene glycol diacrylate), triacrylate resin, poly(lactic acid), and poly(pyrrole). Monodisperse particle populations, ranging from sub-200 nm nanoparticles to complex micron-scale objects, have been fabricated and harvested. PRINT uses low-surface energy, chemically resistant fluoropolymers as molding materials, which eliminates the formation of a residual interconnecting film between molded objects. Until now, the presence of this film has largely prevented particle fabrication using soft lithography. Importantly, we have demonstrated that PRINT affords the simple, straightforward encapsulation of a variety of important bioactive agents, including proteins, DNA, and small-molecule therapeutics, which indicates that PRINT can be used to fabricate next-generation particulate drug-delivery agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja051977c

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Langer R., 2004, Nature, 428, 492
  2. Roy I., 2003, Chem. Biol., 10, 1171
  3. Lopez-Quintela M. A., 2004, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 9, 278
  4. Law M., 2004, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 34, 122
  5. Xia Y. N., 1998, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 37, 575
  6. Xia Y. N., 1999, Chem. Rev., 99, 1848
  7. Chou S. Y., 1996, J. Science, 272, 87
  8. Xu Q. B., 2004, Nano Lett., 4, 2511
  9. Rolland J. P., 2004, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 43, 5799
  10. Schmidt C. E., 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 94, 8953
  11. Su M., 2004, Appl. Phys. Lett., 84, 4202
  12. Russell R. J., 1999, Anal. Chem., 71, 3132
  13. Xia Y. N., 1996, Adv. Mater., 8, 1017

Cited by

See all 852

Metadata

Authors
Rolland, J. P., Maynor, B. W., Euliss, L. E., Exner, A. E., Denison, G. M., & DeSimone, J. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2005-06-21
Volume
127
Issue
28
Pages
10096-10100
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
DOI
10.1021/ja051977c
OpenAlex
W2082218425
Cited by
852
References
19
FWCI
19.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.