The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional Near Infrared-Emitting Cr3+/Pr3+ Co-Doped Zinc Gallogermanate Persistent Luminescent Nanoparticles with Superlong Afterglow for in Vivo Targeted Bioimaging
Abstract
Near infrared (NIR)-emitting persistent luminescent nanoparticles (PLNPs) have great potential for in vivo bioimaging with the advantages of no need for in situ excitation, high signal-to-noise ratio, and deep tissue penetration. However, functional NIR-emitting PLNPs with long afterglow for long-term in vivo imaging are lacking. Here, we show the synthesis of NIR-emitting long-persistent luminescent nanoparticles (LPLNPs) Zn2.94Ga1.96Ge2O10:Cr(3+),Pr(3+) by a citrate sol-gel method in combination with a subsequent reducing atmosphere-free calcination. The persistent luminescence of the LPLNPs is significantly improved via codoping Pr(3+)/Cr(3+) and creating suitable Zn deficiency in zinc gallogermanate. The LPLNP powder exhibits bright NIR luminescence in the biological transparency window with a superlong afterglow time of over 15 days. A persistent energy transfer between host and Cr(3+) ion in the LPLNPs is observed and its mechanism is discussed. PEGylation greatly improves the biocompatibility and water solubility of the LPLNPs. Further bioconjugation with c(RGDyK) peptide makes the LPLNPs promising for long-term in vivo targeted tumor imaging with low toxicity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Second window for in vivo imaging
Smith, A. M., Mancini, M. C., & Nie, S. (2009) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.326 · Cited by 2,848
Longmire, M., Choyke, P. L., & Kobayashi, H. (2008) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/17435889.3.5.703 · Cited by 2,149
A route to brightly fluorescent carbon nanotubes for near-infrared imaging in mice
Welsher, K., Liu, Z., Sherlock, S. P., Robinson, J. T., Chen, Z., Daranciang, D., & Dai, H. (2009) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.294 · Cited by 1,287
Multimodality Imaging Probes: Design and Challenges
Louie, A. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9003538 · Cited by 1,044
Cited by
X-ray-activated persistent luminescence nanomaterials for NIR-II imaging
Pei, P., Chen, Y., Sun, C., Fan, Y., Yang, Y., Liu, X., Lu, L., Zhao, M., Zhang, H., Zhao, D., et al. (2021) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-021-00922-3 · Cited by 718
Ultralong Phosphorescence of Water‐Soluble Organic Nanoparticles for In Vivo Afterglow Imaging
Zhen, X., Tao, Y., An, Z., Chen, P., Xu, C., Chen, R., Huang, W., & Pu, K. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201606665 · Cited by 602
Advances in Chromium‐Activated Phosphors for Near‐Infrared Light Sources
Zhao, F., Song, Z., & Liu, Q. (2022) · Laser & Photonics Reviews · doi:10.1002/lpor.202200380 · Cited by 490
Molecular Probes for Autofluorescence-Free Optical Imaging
Jiang, Y., & Pu, K. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00506 · Cited by 426
Sun, S.-K., Wang, H.-F., & Yan, X.-P. (2018) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00619 · Cited by 384
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdukayum, A., Chen, J.-T., Zhao, Q., & Yan, X.-P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-09-17
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 14125-14133
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2093872120
- Cited by
- 712
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.