The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polyprodrug Amphiphiles: Hierarchical Assemblies for Shape-Regulated Cellular Internalization, Trafficking, and Drug Delivery
Open accessAbstract
Solution self-assembly of block copolymers (BCPs) typically generates spheres, rods, and vesicles. The reproducible bottom-up fabrication of stable planar nanostructures remains elusive due to their tendency to bend into closed bilayers. This morphological vacancy renders the study of shape effects on BCP nanocarrier-cell interactions incomplete. Furthermore, the fabrication of single BCP assemblies with built-in drug delivery functions and geometry-optimized performance remains a major challenge. We demonstrate that PEG-b-PCPTM polyprodrug amphiphiles, where PEG is poly(ethylene glycol) and PCPTM is polymerized block of reduction-cleavable camptothecin (CPT) prodrug monomer, with >50 wt % CPT loading content can self-assemble into four types of uniform nanostructures including spheres, large compound vesicles, smooth disks, and unprecedented staggered lamellae with spiked periphery. Staggered lamellae outperform the other three nanostructure types, exhibiting extended blood circulation duration, the fastest cellular uptake, and unique internalization pathways. We also explore shape-modulated CPT release kinetics, nanostructure degradation, and in vitro cytotoxicities. The controlled hierarchical organization of polyprodrug amphiphiles and shape-tunable biological performance opens up new horizons for exploring next-generation BCP-based drug delivery systems with improved efficacy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy
Peer, D., Karp, J. M., Hong, S., Farokhzad, O. C., Margalit, R., & Langer, R. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.387 · Cited by 8,710
The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways
Gratton, S. E. A., Ropp, P. A., Pohlhaus, P. D., Luft, J. C., Madden, V. J., Napier, M. E., & DeSimone, J. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801763105 · Cited by 2,918
Stability of Self-Assembled Polymeric Micelles in Serum
Lu, J., Owen, S. C., & Shoichet, M. S. (2011) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma200675w · Cited by 299
Future of the Particle Replication in Nonwetting Templates (PRINT) Technology
Xu, J., Wong, D. H. C., Byrne, J. D., Chen, K., Bowerman, C., & DeSimone, J. M. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201209145 · Cited by 208
Cited by
Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery, tumor imaging, therapy and theranostics
Mi, P. (2020) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.38069 · Cited by 830
The importance of nanoparticle shape in cancer drug delivery
Truong, N. P., Whittaker, M. R., Mak, C. W., & Davis, T. P. (2015) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1517/17425247.2014.950564 · Cited by 594
Drug self-delivery systems for cancer therapy
Qin, S.-Y., Zhang, A.-Q., Cheng, S.-X., Rong, L., & Zhang, X.-Z. (2017) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.016 · Cited by 532
Applications of π-π stacking interactions in the design of drug-delivery systems
Zhuang, W.-R., Wang, Y., Cui, P.-F., Xing, L., Lee, J., Kim, D., Jiang, H.-L., & Oh, Y.-K. (2019) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.12.014 · Cited by 508
ROS‐Responsive Polyprodrug Nanoparticles for Triggered Drug Delivery and Effective Cancer Therapy
Xu, X., Saw, P. E., Tao, W., Li, Y., Ji, X., Bhasin, S., Liu, Y., Ayyash, D., Rasmussen, J., Huo, M., et al. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201700141 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, X., Hu, J., Tian, J., Ge, Z., Zhang, G., Luo, K., & Liu, S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-11-07
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 17617-17629
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2328082795
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.