Cited by 299Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsDendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers

Stability of Self-Assembled Polymeric Micelles in Serum

Open access
Lu, Jiao, Owen, Shawn C., Shoichet, Molly S.·2011·Macromolecules

Abstract

The stability of polymeric nanoparticles in serum is critical to their use in drug delivery where dilution after intravenous injection often results in nanoparticle disassembly and drug unloading; however, few investigate this in biologically relevant media. To gain greater insight into nanoparticle stability in blood, the stability of self-assembled polymeric micelles of poly(d,l-lactide-co-2-methyl-2-carboxytrimethylene carbonate)-g-poly(ethylene glycol), P(LA-co-TMCC)-g-PEG, were tested in both serum and individual serum protein solutions. By encapsulating Förster resonance energy transfer pairs and following their release by fluorescence, these micelles demonstrated excellent thermodynamic and kinetic stability in the presence of serum. Further analyses by fast protein liquid chromatography and dynamic light scattering confirmed these data. Moreover, these micelles are compatible with red blood cells, as shown by a hemolysis assay. The stability and compatibility demonstrated in blood suggest that these micelles may be stable in vivo, which is critical for intravenous drug delivery applications. This comprehensive approach to understanding micelle stability and compatibility is broadly applicable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma200675w

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jiwpanich et al. demonstrated significant differences in the stability of micelles depending on the composition (for instance tween 80 and CTAB vs poloxamers) and also evaluated the role of cross-linking in tuning the rate of exchange.

    “With this technique, Jiwpanich et al. [232] demonstrated significant differences in the stability of micelles depending on the composition (for instance tween 80 and CTAB vs poloxamers) and also evaluated the role of the cross-linking in tuning the rate of exchange.”

    From Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: An insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions (2021) · cites this paper as [232]

    The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) compare the paper’s slow dye exchange with that reported for highly cross-linked nanogels, citing Jiwpanich et al. The Introduction also describes FRET as a way to study exchange between micelles. Our copy does not report a Tween 80/CTAB-versus-poloxamer comparison or say that Jiwpanich et al. tested how cross-linking tunes the exchange rate. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Shi M.; Ho K.; Keating A.; Shoichet M. S. Adv Funct Mater 2009, 19 (11), 1689–1696.
  2. Devine D. V.; Marjan J. M. J. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug 1997, 14 (2), 105–131. 9107519
  3. Kwon G. S.; Okano T. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1996, 21 (2), 107–116.
  4. Allen C.; Maysinger D.; Eisenberg A. Colloids Surf., B 1999, 16 (1–4), 3–27.
  5. Lu J.; Shoichet M. S. Macromolecules 2010, 43 (11), 4943–4953.
  6. Verdonck B.; Gohy J. F.; Khousakoun E.; Jerome R.; Du Prez F. Polymer 2005, 46 (23), 9899–9907.
  7. Beck W. S., Hematology; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1991.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, J., Owen, S. C., & Shoichet, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Shoichet, Molly S.
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2011-07-08
Volume
44
Issue
15
Pages
6002-6008
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2043461452
Cited by
299
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Macromolecules (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
Keywords
polymeric micelles, polyethylene glycol conjugates, drug delivery, fluorescence resonance energy transfer, hemocompatibility, erythrocyte hemolysis, intravenous injection, nanoparticle disassembly, serum proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review