Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Studies on Character Impact Odorants of Coffee Brews

Semmelroch, Peter, Grosch, Werner·1996·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
DOI 10.1021/jf9505988
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Twenty-two compounds, which had been revealed by dilution experiments as potent odorants, were quantified by stable isotope dilution assays in brews prepared from roasted Arabica ( Coffea arabica ) and Robusta coffees ( Coffea canephora var. Robusta ). Calculation of odor activity values (OAVs; ratio of concentration to odor threshold) indicated 2-furfurylthiol, 3-mercapto-3-methylbutyl formate, methanethiol, β-damascenone, methylpropanal, and 3-methylbutanal as the most potent odorants. However, the rankings of the OAVs were different in the two coffee brews. The extraction yields obtained during the preparation of the brews were determined for 17 odorants. Polar compounds (e.g. guaiacol, 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2 H )-furanone, 3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl-2(5 H )-furanone, 2,3-butanedione) were extracted with higher yields (75−100%); nonpolar compounds (e.g. β-damascenone, 2-isobutyl-3-methoxypyrazine) gave yields of only 10−25%. The overall odor of the models containing the odorants in the concentration levels that had been found in the two brews was clearly coffee-like. The models reproduce the differences in the odor profiles of the two brews. Keywords: Coffee brew odor; odor analysis coffee brew; odor analysis roasted coffee; coffee brew yield of odorants; sensory study coffee brew; isotope dilution assay

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf9505988

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Semmelroch, P., & Grosch, W.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
537-543
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
DOI
10.1021/jf9505988
OpenAlex
W2036150874
Cited by
304
References
0
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.