The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antioxidant Capacity of Tea and Common Vegetables
Abstract
Previously, some fruits were shown to contain high antioxidant activities. In this paper, we report the antioxidant activities of 22 common vegetables, one green tea, and one black tea measured using the automated oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay with three different reactive species: a peroxyl radical generator, a hydroxyl radical generator, and Cu 2+, a transition metal. Based on the fresh weight of the vegetable, garlic had the highest antioxidant activity (μmol of Trolox equiv/g) against peroxyl radicals (19.4) followed by kale (17.7), spinach (12.6), Brussels sprouts, alfalfa sprouts, broccoli flowers, beets, red bell pepper, onion, corn, eggplant (9.8−3.9), cauliflower, potato, sweet potato, cabbage, leaf lettuce, string bean, carrot, yellow squash, iceberg lettuce, celery, and cucumber (3.8−0.5); kale had the highest antioxidant activity against hydroxyl radicals followed by Brussels sprouts, alfalfa sprouts, beets, spinach, broccoli flowers, and the others. The green and black teas had much higher antioxidant activities against peroxyl radicals than all these vegetables. However, the tea also showed a prooxidant activity in the presence of Cu 2+, which was not found with any of the vegetables studied. Keywords: Antioxidant; free radical; tea; vegetable
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diet and Health: What Should We Eat?
Willett, W. C. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8160011 · Cited by 1,008
Micronutrients and cancer risk
Willett, W. (1994) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/59.5.1162s · Cited by 143
Cited by
Polyphenols: Chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance
Bravo, L. (2009) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01670.x · Cited by 4,030
Shahidi, F., & Ambigaipalan, P. (2015) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018 · Cited by 3,081
Beneficial Effects of Green Tea—A Review
Cabrera, C., Artacho, R., & Giménez, R. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2006.10719518 · Cited by 1,904
Prior, R. L., Hoang, H., Gu, L., Wu, X., Bacchiocca, M., Howard, L., Hampsch-Woodill, M., Huang, D., Ou, B., & Jacob, R. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0262256 · Cited by 1,455
Self-citationBy-products of plant food processing as a source of functional compounds—Recent developments
Schieber, A., Stintzing, F. C., & Carle, R. (2001) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s0924-2244(02)00012-2 · Cited by 1,334
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, G., Sofic, E., & Prior, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3426-3431
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2137206624
- Cited by
- 1,295
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.