Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polyelectrolyte Multilayers with a Tunable Young's Modulus: Influence of Film Stiffness on Cell Adhesion

Schneider, Aurore, Francius, Grégory, Obeid, Rodolphe, Schwinté, Pascale, Hemmerlé, Joseph, Frisch, Benoît, Schaaf, Pierre, Voegel, Jean-Claude, Senger, Bernard, Picart, Catherine·2006·Langmuir

Abstract

Mechanical properties of model and natural gels have recently been demonstrated to play an important role in various cellular processes such as adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, besides events triggered by chemical ligands. Understanding the biomaterial/cell interface is particularly important in many tissue engineering applications and in implant surgery. One of the final goals would be to control cellular processes precisely at the biomaterial surface and to guide tissue regeneration. In this work, we investigate the substrate mechanical effect on cell adhesion for thin polyelectrolyte multilayer (PEM) films, which can be easily deposited on any type of material. The films were cross linked by means of a water-soluble carbodiimide (EDC), and the film elastic modulus was determined using the AFM nanoindentation technique with a colloidal probe. The Young's modulus could be varied over 2 orders of magnitude (from 3 to 400 kPa) for wet poly(L-lysine)/hyaluronan (PLL/HA) films by changing the EDC concentration. The chemical changes upon cross linking were characterized by means of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). We demonstrated that the adhesion and spreading of human chondrosarcoma cells directly depend on the Young's modulus. These data indicate that, besides the chemical properties of the polyelectrolytes, the substrate mechanics of PEM films is an important parameter influencing cell adhesion and that PEM offer a new way to prepare thin films of tunable mechanical properties with large potential biomedical applications including drug release.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la0521802

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Schneider, A., Francius, G., Obeid, R., Schwinté, P., Hemmerlé, J., Frisch, B., Schaaf, P., Voegel, J.-C., Senger, B., & Picart, C.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2005-12-22
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
1193-1200
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2045856259
Cited by
324
References
30
FWCI
7.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.