Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Laser Photofabrication of Cell-Containing Hydrogel Constructs

Open access
Ovsianikov, Aleksandr, Mühleder, Severin, Torgersen, Jan, Li, Zhiquan, Qin, Xiao-Hua, Van Vlierberghe, Sandra, Dubruel, Peter, Holnthoner, Wolfgang, Redl, Heinz, Liska, Robert, Stampfl, Jürgen·2014·Langmuir

Abstract

The two-photon polymerization (2PP) of photosensitive gelatin in the presence of living cells is reported. The 2PP technique is based on the localized cross-linking of photopolymers induced by femtosecond laser pulses. The availability of water-soluble photoinitiators (PI) suitable for 2PP is crucial for applying this method to cell-containing materials. Novel PIs developed by our group allow 2PP of formulations with up to 80% cell culture medium. The cytocompatibility of these PIs was evaluated by an MTT assay. The results of cell encapsulation by 2PP show the occurrence of cell damage within the laser-exposed regions. However, some cells located in the immediate vicinity and even within the 2PP-produced structures remain viable and can further proliferate. The control experiments demonstrate that the laser radiation itself does not damage the cells at the parameters used for 2PP. On the basis of these findings and the reports by other groups, we conclude that such localized cell damage is of a chemical origin and can be attributed to reactive species generated during 2PP. The viable cells trapped within the 2PP structures but not exposed to laser radiation continued to proliferate. The live/dead staining after 3 weeks revealed viable cells occupying most of the space available within the 3D hydrogel constructs. While some of the questions raised by this study remain open, the presented results indicate the general practicability of 2PP for 3D processing of cell-containing materials. The potential applications of this highly versatile approach span from precise engineering of 3D tissue models to the fabrication of cellular microarrays.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la402346z

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Ovsianikov, A., Mühleder, S., Torgersen, J., Li, Z., Qin, X.-H., Van Vlierberghe, S., Dubruel, P., Holnthoner, W., Redl, H., Liska, R., & Stampfl, J.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2013-10-01
Volume
30
Issue
13
Pages
3787-3794
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2325302096
Cited by
182
References
6
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.