The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Study of Droplet Formation Process during Drop-on-Demand Inkjetting of Living Cell-Laden Bioink
Abstract
Biofabrication offers a great potential for the fabrication of three-dimensional living tissues and organs by precisely layer-by-layer placing various tissue spheroids as anatomically designed. Inkjet printing of living cell-laden bioink is one of the most promising technologies enabling biofabrication, and the bioink printability must be carefully examined for it to be a viable biofabrication technology. In this study, the cell-laden bioink droplet formation process has been studied in terms of the breakup time, droplet size and velocity, and satellite formation using a time-resolved imaging approach. The bioink has been prepared using fibroblasts and sodium alginate with four different cell concentrations: without cells, 1 × 10(6), 5 × 10(6), and 1 × 10(7) cells/mL to appreciate the effect of cell concentration on the droplet formation process. Furthermore, the bioink droplet formation process is compared with that during the inkjetting of a comparable polystyrene microbead-laden suspension under the identical operating conditions to understand the effect of particle physical properties on the droplet formation process. It is found that (1) as the cell concentration of bioink increases, the droplet size and velocity decrease, the formation of satellite droplets is suppressed, and the breakup time increases, and (2) compared to the hard bead-laden suspension, the bioink tends to have a less ejected fluid volume, lower droplet velocity, and longer breakup time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview
Gungor-Ozkerim, P. S., Inci, I., Zhang, Y. S., Khademhosseini, A., & Dokmeci, M. R. (2018) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c7bm00765e · Cited by 1,428
Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering
Matai, I., Kaur, G., Seyedsalehi, A., McClinton, A., & Laurencin, C. T. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 · Cited by 1,156
Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting
Hölzl, K., Lin, S., Tytgat, L., Van Vlierberghe, S., Gu, L., & Ovsianikov, A. (2016) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002 · Cited by 1,070
Biofabrication strategies for 3D in vitro models and regenerative medicine
Moroni, L., Burdick, J. A., Highley, C., Lee, S. J., Morimoto, Y., Takeuchi, S., & Yoo, J. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0006-y · Cited by 753
3D Cell Culture in Alginate Hydrogels
Andersen, T., Auk-Emblem, P., & Dornish, M. (2015) · Microarrays · doi:10.3390/microarrays4020133 · Cited by 472
Bioprinting for vascular and vascularized tissue biofabrication
Datta, P., Ayan, B., & Ozbolat, I. T. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.035 · Cited by 431
Bioprinting Technology: A Current State-of-the-Art Review
Dababneh, A. B., & Ozbolat, I. T. (2014) · Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4028512 · Cited by 427
Freeform inkjet printing of cellular structures with bifurcations
Christensen, K., Xu, C., Chai, W., Zhang, Z., Fu, J., & Huang, Y. (2015) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.25501 · Cited by 351
Self-citationThe rheology of direct and suspended extrusion bioprinting
Cooke, M. E., & Rosenzweig, D. H. (2021) · APL Bioengineering · doi:10.1063/5.0031475 · Cited by 284
Inkjet and inkjet-based 3D printing: connecting fluid properties and printing performance
Guo, Y., Patanwala, H. S., Bognet, B., & Ma, A. W. K. (2017) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/rpj-05-2016-0076 · Cited by 258
Natural Polymers for Organ 3D Bioprinting
Liu, F., Chen, Q., Liu, C., Ao, Q., Tian, X., Fan, J., Tong, H., & Wang, X. (2018) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym10111278 · Cited by 170
In vitro 3D skin culture and its sustainability in toxicology: a narrative review
Masri, S., Fauzi, M. B., Rajab, N. F., Lee, W.-H., Zainal Abidin, D. A., & Siew, E. L. (2024) · Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/21691401.2024.2407617 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, C., Zhang, M., Huang, Y., Ogale, A., Fu, J., & Markwald, R. R.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-07-21
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 9130-9138
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2318147750
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.