The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contact Shape Controls Adhesion of Bioinspired Fibrillar Surfaces
Abstract
Following a recent bioinspired paradigm, patterned surfaces can exhibit better adhesion than flat contacts. Previous studies have verified that finer contact structures give rise to higher adhesion forces. In this study, we report on the effect of the tip shape, which was varied systematically in fibrillar PDMS surfaces, produced by lithographic and soft-molding methods. For fiber radii between 2.5 and 25 microm, it is found that shape exerts a stronger effect on adhesion than size. The highest adhesion is measured for mushroom-like and spatular terminals, which attain adhesion values 30 times in excess of the flat controls and similar to a gecko toe. These results explain the shapes commonly found in biological systems, and help in the exploration of the parameter space for artificial attachment systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair
Autumn, K., Liang, Y. A., Hsieh, S. T., Zesch, W., Chan, W. P., Kenny, T. W., Fearing, R., & Full, R. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35015073 · Cited by 2,758
Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae
Autumn, K., Sitti, M., Liang, Y. A., Peattie, A. M., Hansen, W. R., Sponberg, S., Kenny, T. W., Fearing, R., Israelachvili, J. N., & Full, R. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.192252799 · Cited by 1,949
Fedeli, L., & Huebl, A. (2022) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6464240 · Cited by 1,319
From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices
Arzt, E., Gorb, S., & Spolenak, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1534701100 · Cited by 1,149
Self-citationMechanisms of Adhesion in Geckos
Autumn, K. (2002) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/42.6.1081 · Cited by 596
Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle
(2002) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47515-4 · Cited by 531
Biomimetic mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure
Gorb, S., Varenberg, M., Peressadko, A., & Tuma, J. (2007) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2006.0164 · Cited by 523
Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures as dry adhesives
Sitti, M., & Fearing, R. S. (2003) · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · doi:10.1163/156856103322113788 · Cited by 494
Adhesion of Bioinspired Micropatterned Surfaces: Effects of Pillar Radius, Aspect Ratio, and Preload
Greiner, C., del Campo, A., & Arzt, E. (2007) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la0633987 · Cited by 435
Self-citationBiologically inspired polymer microfibers with spatulate tips as repeatable fibrillar adhesives
Kim, S., & Sitti, M. (2006) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2424442 · Cited by 361
Adhesion of Biologically Inspired Vertical and Angled Polymer Microfiber Arrays
Aksak, B., Murphy, M. P., & Sitti, M. (2007) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la062697t · Cited by 314
A batch fabricated biomimetic dry adhesive
Northen, M. T., & Turner, K. L. (2005) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/16/8/030 · Cited by 249
Patterned Surfaces with Pillars with Controlled 3D Tip Geometry Mimicking Bioattachment Devices
del Campo, A., Greiner, C., Álvarez, I., & Arzt, E. (2007) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200602476 · Cited by 234
Self-citationPeeling from a biomimetically patterned thin elastic film
Ghatak, A., Mahadevan, L., Chung, J. Y., Chaudhury, M. K., & Shenoy, V. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2004.1313 · Cited by 198
Roles of discontinuities in bio-inspired adhesive pads
Chung, J. Y., & Chaudhury, M. K. (2005) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2004.0020 · Cited by 192
On the Adhesion between Fine Particles and Nanocontacts: An Atomic Force Microscope Study
Farshchi-Tabrizi, M., Kappl, M., Cheng, Y., Gutmann, J. S., & Butt, H. (2006) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la052760z · Cited by 176
Controlling Polymer Adhesion with “Pancakes”
Crosby, A. J., Hageman, M., & Duncan, A. (2005) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la051721k · Cited by 170
Influence of Surface Roughness on Adhesion between Elastic Bodies
Peressadko, A., Hosoda, N., & Persson, B. N. J. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.124301 · Cited by 137
Adhesion enhancement in a biomimetic fibrillar interface
Glassmaker, N. J., Jagota, A., & Hui, C. (2005) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2005.02.005 · Cited by 81
Towards a micromechanical understanding of biological surface devices
Arzt, E., Enders, S., & Gorb, S. N. (2002) · International Journal of Materials Research (formerly Zeitschrift fuer Metallkunde) · doi:10.3139/146.020345 · Cited by 76
Self-citation
Cited by
Parness, A., Soto, D., Esparza, N., Gravish, N., Wilkinson, M., Autumn, K., & Cutkosky, M. (2009) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0048 · Cited by 277
Waalbot II: Adhesion Recovery and Improved Performance of a Climbing Robot using Fibrillar Adhesives
Murphy, M. P., Kute, C., Mengüç, Y., & Sitti, M. (2011) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364910382862 · Cited by 247
Recent advances in the fabrication and adhesion testing of biomimetic dry adhesives
Sameoto, D., & Menon, C. (2010) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/103001 · Cited by 157
The Gecko’s Toe: Scaling Directional Adhesives for Climbing Applications
Hawkes, E. W., Eason, E. V., Asbeck, A. T., & Cutkosky, M. R. (2013) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2012.2209672 · Cited by 112
Microwedge Machining for the Manufacture of Directional Dry Adhesives
Day, P., Eason, E. V., Esparza, N., Christensen, D., & Cutkosky, M. (2013) · Journal of Micro and Nano-Manufacturing · doi:10.1115/1.4023161 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- del Campo, A., Greiner, C., & Arzt, E.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-08-28
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 10235-10243
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W1987999583
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 31.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
