The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting Differential and Correlated Protein Expression in Label-Free Shotgun Proteomics
Abstract
Recent studies have revealed a relationship between protein abundance and sampling statistics, such as sequence coverage, peptide count, and spectral count, in label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) shotgun proteomics. The use of sampling statistics offers a promising method of measuring relative protein abundance and detecting differentially expressed or coexpressed proteins. We performed a systematic analysis of various approaches to quantifying differential protein expression in eukaryotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae and prokaryotic Rhodopseudomonas palustris label-free LC-MS/MS data. First, we showed that, among three sampling statistics, the spectral count has the highest technical reproducibility, followed by the less-reproducible peptide count and relatively nonreproducible sequence coverage. Second, we used spectral count statistics to measure differential protein expression in pairwise experiments using five statistical tests: Fisher's exact test, G-test, AC test, t-test, and LPE test. Given the S. cerevisiae data set with spiked proteins as a benchmark and the false positive rate as a metric, our evaluation suggested that the Fisher's exact test, G-test, and AC test can be used when the number of replications is limited (one or two), whereas the t-test is useful with three or more replicates available. Third, we generalized the G-test to increase the sensitivity of detecting differential protein expression under multiple experimental conditions. Out of 1622 identified R. palustris proteins in the LC-MS/MS experiment, the generalized G-test detected 1119 differentially expressed proteins under six growth conditions. Finally, we studied correlated expression of these 1119 proteins by analyzing pairwise expression correlations and by delineating protein clusters according to expression patterns. Through pairwise expression correlation analysis, we demonstrated that proteins co-located in the same operon were much more strongly coexpressed than those from different operons. Combining cluster analysis with existing protein functional annotations, we identified six protein clusters with known biological significance. In summary, the proposed generalized G-test using spectral count sampling statistics is a viable methodology for robust quantification of relative protein abundance and for sensitive detection of biologically significant differential protein expression under multiple experimental conditions in label-free shotgun proteomics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures: Third Edition
Sheskin, D. J. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9781420036268 · Cited by 1,551
Wolfe, C. J., Kohane, I. S., & Butte, A. J. (2005) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-6-227 · Cited by 422
Cited by
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer
CPTAC, T. N., Zhang, B., Wang, J., Wang, X., Zhu, J., Liu, Q., Shi, Z., Chambers, M. C., Zimmerman, L. J., Shaddox, K. F., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13438 · Cited by 1,462
Self-citationQuantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present
Bantscheff, M., Lemeer, S., Savitski, M. M., & Kuster, B. (2012) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6203-4 · Cited by 801
Mass Spectrometry-Based Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics
Zhu, W., Smith, J. W., & Huang, C.-M. (2010) · Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology · doi:10.1155/2010/840518 · Cited by 629
Zhu, Y., Piehowski, P. D., Zhao, R., Chen, J., Shen, Y., Moore, R. J., Shukla, A. K., Petyuk, V. A., Campbell-Thompson, M., Mathews, C. E., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03367-w · Cited by 587
Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics
Lundgren, D. H., Hwang, S.-I., Wu, L., & Han, D. K. (2010) · Expert Review of Proteomics · doi:10.1586/epr.09.69 · Cited by 428
Significance Analysis of Spectral Count Data in Label-free Shotgun Proteomics
Choi, H., Fermin, D., & Nesvizhskii, A. I. (2008) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m800203-mcp200 · Cited by 364
Adipokines: A treasure trove for the discovery of biomarkers for metabolic disorders
Lehr, S., Hartwig, S., & Sell, H. (2012) · PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications · doi:10.1002/prca.201100052 · Cited by 352
Quantitation in Mass-Spectrometry-Based Proteomics
Schulze, W. X., & Usadel, B. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112132 · Cited by 344
Dyhrman, S. T., Jenkins, B. D., Rynearson, T. A., Saito, M. A., Mercier, M. L., Alexander, H., Whitney, L. P., Drzewianowski, A., Bulygin, V. V., Bertrand, E. M., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033768 · Cited by 337
Functional analysis of natural microbial consortia using community proteomics
VerBerkmoes, N. C., Denef, V. J., Hettich, R. L., & Banfield, J. F. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2080 · Cited by 269
Self-citationThe microprotein Minion controls cell fusion and muscle formation
Zhang, Q., Vashisht, A. A., O’Rourke, J., Corbel, S. Y., Moran, R., Romero, A., Miraglia, L., Zhang, J., Durrant, E., Schmedt, C., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15664 · Cited by 267
Serum Amyloid A in Uremic HDL Promotes Inflammation
Weichhart, T., Kopecky, C., Kubicek, M., Haidinger, M., Döller, D., Katholnig, K., Suarna, C., Eller, P., Tölle, M., Gerner, C., et al. (2012) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2011070668 · Cited by 201
Protein Identification Using Customized Protein Sequence Databases Derived from RNA-Seq Data
Wang, X., Slebos, R. J. C., Wang, D., Halvey, P. J., Tabb, D. L., Liebler, D. C., & Zhang, B. (2012) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr200766z · Cited by 173
Self-citationRexer, B. N., Ham, A.-J. L., Rinehart, C., Hill, S., de Matos Granja-Ingram, N., González-Angulo, A. M., Mills, G. B., Dave, B., Chang, J. C., Liebler, D. C., et al. (2011) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2011.130 · Cited by 139
Thomas, S. N., Funk, K. E., Wan, Y., Liao, Z., Davies, P., Kuret, J., & Yang, A. J. (2012) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0893-0 · Cited by 123
Detecting the Immune System Response of a 500 Year-Old Inca Mummy
Corthals, A., Koller, A., Martin, D. W., Rieger, R., Chen, E. I., Bernaski, M., Recagno, G., & Dávalos, L. M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041244 · Cited by 65
Garge, N., Pan, H., Rowland, M. D., Cargile, B. J., Zhang, X., Cooley, P. C., Page, G. P., & Bunger, M. K. (2010) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m900378-mcp200 · Cited by 36
Kuntumalla, S., Braisted, J. C., Huang, S.-T., Parmar, P. P., Clark, D. J., Alami, H., Zhang, Q., Donohue-Rolfe, A., Tzipori, S., Fleischmann, R. D., et al. (2009) · Proteome Science · doi:10.1186/1477-5956-7-22 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, B., VerBerkmoes, N. C., Langston, M. A., Uberbacher, E., Hettich, R. L., & Samatova, N. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-10-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2909-2918
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2063543381
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
