Cited by 187Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCrime Patterns and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding the Links Among School Misbehavior, Academic Achievement, and Cigarette Use: A National Panel Study of Adolescents

Open access
Bryant, Alison L., Schulenberg, John, Bachman, Jerald G., O'Malley, Patrick M., Johnston, Lloyd D.·2000·Prevention Science

Abstract

Relations among academic achievement, school bonding, school misbehavior, and cigarette use from 8th to 12th grade were examined in two national panel samples of youth (n = 3056). A series of competing conceptual models developed a priori was tested using structural equation modeling (SEM). The findings suggest that during middle adolescence the predominant direction of influence is from school experiences to cigarette use. School misbehavior and low academic achievement contribute to increased cigarette use over time both directly and indirectly. Two-group SEM analyses involving two cohorts-gender and ethnicity- revealed that our findings are robust. In addition, comparisons between high school dropouts and nondropouts and between eighth-grade cigarette use initiators and nonusers revealed few differences in direction or magnitude of effects. Results suggest that prevention programs that attempt to reduce school misbehavior and academic failure, as well as to help students who misbehave and have difficulty in school constructively avoid negative school- and health-related outcomes, are likely to be effective in reducing adolescent cigarette use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1010038130788

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The validity of ODRs as indicators of behavioral status and school adaptation has been supported by their association with lower academic achievement and school bonding over time.

    “The validity of ODRs as indicators of behavioral status and school adaptation has been supported by their association with lower academic achievement and school bonding over time (e.g., Bryant et al. 2000).”

    From Intervention to Strengthen Emotional Self-Regulation in Children with Emerging Mental Health Problems: Proximal Impact on School Behavior (2010) · cites this paper as Bryant et al. 2000

    The School Misbehavior measure includes students’ reports of being sent to the office or kept after school, and the Cohort Comparisons section reports that school misbehavior predicted lower academic achievement and school bonding at different follow-ups. But the study analyzed a composite misbehavior measure, not office discipline referral (ODR) records specifically, and it did not establish the validity of ODRs as indicators. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Formal disciplinary incidents and suspensions are associated over time with lower academic achievement and school bonding and with increased conduct problems.

    “which are associated over time with lower academic achievement and school bonding and with increased conduct problems (Bryant et al. 2000; Huisinga and Jakob-Chien 1998).”

    From Intervention to Strengthen Emotional Self-Regulation in Children with Emerging Mental Health Problems: Proximal Impact on School Behavior (2010) · cites this paper as Bryant et al. 2000

    The School Misbehavior section includes suspensions in the measure of misbehavior, and the Implications section links early misbehavior to later decreases in school bonding and academic achievement. The paper does not establish that formal disciplinary incidents or suspensions, specifically, are associated with increased conduct problems over time; it treats suspensions and misbehavior as components of the same measure. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. Allred, C. G. (1995). Positive action for living.Twin Falls, ID: The Positive Action Company.
  2. Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & O'Malley, P. M. (1996). The Monitoring the Future project after twenty-two years: Design and procedures.(Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper No. 38.) Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
  3. Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & O'Malley, P. M. (1981). Smoking, drinking, and drug use among American high school students: Correlates and trends, 1975–1979.American Journal of Public Health, 71(1), 59–69. · DOI
  4. Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., & Johnston, J. (1978). Adolescence to adulthood: Change and stability in the lives of young men. Youth in Transition, Volume VI.Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
  5. Bailey, S. L., & Hubbard, R. L. (1990). Developmental variation in the context of marijuana initiation among adolescents.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 58–70. · DOI
  6. Barrington, B. L., & Hendricks, B. (1989). Differentiating characteristics of high school graduates, dropouts, and nongraduates.Journal of Educational Research, 82(6), 309–319. · DOI
  7. Bell, A. J., Rosén, L. A., & Dynlacht, D. (1994). Truancy intervention.The Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(3), 203–211.
  8. Berndt, T. J., & Mekos, D. (1995). Adolescents' perceptions of the stressful and desirable aspects of the transition to junior high school.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5, 123–142. · DOI
  9. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables.New York: John Wiley & Sons. · DOI
  10. Brunswick, A. F., & Messeri, P. A. (1984). Origins of cigarette smoking in academic achievement, stress and social expectations: Does gender make a difference? Journal of Early Adolescence, 4, 353–370. · DOI
  11. Bryant, A. L., Schulenberg, J., Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2000). Acting out and lighting up: Understanding the links among school misbehavior, academic achievement, and cigarette use during adolescence (Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper No. 46). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
  12. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  13. Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., & Neckerman, H. J. (1989). Early school dropout: Configurations and determinants.Child Development, 60, 1437–1452. · DOI
  14. Clausen, J. S. (1991). Adolescent competence and the shaping of the life course.American Journal of Sociology, 96(4), 805–842. · DOI
  15. Crockett, L., Schulenberg, J. E., & Petersen, A. C. (1987). Congruence between objective and self-report data in a sample of young adolescents.Journal of Adolescent Research, 2, 383–392. · DOI
  16. Diem, E. C., McKay, L. C., & Jamieson, J. L. (1994). Female adolescent alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use: Similarities and differences in patterns of use.The International Journal of the Addictions, 29(8), 987–997. · DOI
  17. Dryfoos, J. G. (1990). Adolescents at risk: Prevalence and prevention.New York: Oxford University Press.
  18. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Alpert, A., Hops, H., Stoolmiller, M., & Muthén, B. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel substance use data.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(3), 275–318. · DOI
  19. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents.In R. E. Ames, & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.
  20. Free, M. D. (1993). Stages of drug use: A social control perspective.Youth and Society, 25, 251–271. · DOI
  21. Friedman, A. S., Glickman, N., & Utada, A. (1985). Does drug and alcohol use lead to failure to graduate from high school? Journal of Drug Education, 15(4), 353–364. · DOI
  22. Galambos, N. L., & Silbereisen, R. K. (1987). Substance use in West German youth: A longitudinal study of adolescents' use of alcohol and tobacco.Journal of Adolescent Research, 2(2), 161–174. · DOI
  23. Garnier, H. E., Stein, J. A., & Jacobs, J. K. (1997). The process of dropping out of high school: A 19-year perspective.American Educational Research Journal, 34, 395–419. · DOI
  24. Gold, M., & Mann, D. W. (1982). Alternative schools for troublesome secondary students.The Urban Review, 14, 305–316. · DOI
  25. Gottfredson, D. C., Gottfredson, G. D., & Skroban, S. (1996). A multimodel school-based prevention demonstration.Journal of Adolescent Research, 11(1), 97–115. · DOI
  26. Hawkins, J. D., Graham, J. W., Maguin, E., Abbott, R., Hill, K. G., & Catalano, R. F. (1997). Exploring the effects of age of alcohol use initiation and psychosocial risk factors on subsequent alcohol misuse.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58(3), 280–290. · DOI
  27. Hawkins, J. D., & Weis, J. G. (1985). The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention.Journal of Primary Prevention, 6(2), 73–97. · DOI
  28. Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL.Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  29. Hibbett, A., & Fogelman, K. (1990). Future lives of truants: Family formation and health-related behavior.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 171–179. · DOI
  30. Hinshaw, S. P. (1992). Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms.Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 127–155. · DOI
  31. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency.Berkeley: University of California Press.
  32. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Hundleby, J. D., Carpenter, R. A., Ross, R. A. J., & Mercer, G. W. (1982). Adolescent drug use and other behaviors.Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 23(1), 61–68. · DOI
  34. Ianni, F. A. J., & Orr, M. T. (1996). Dropping out.In J. A. Graber, J. Brooks-Gunn, & A. C. Peterson (Eds.), Transitions through adolescence (pp. 285–321). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  35. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. · DOI
  36. Jenkins, P. H. (1995). School delinquency and school commitment.Sociology of Education, 68, 221–239. · DOI
  37. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth.New York: Academic Press.
  38. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1998). National survey results on drug use from the Monitoring the Future study, 1975–1997, Vol 1.Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
  39. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J., & Bachman, J. G. (1996). Aims and objectives of the Monitoring the Future study (2nd revised edition) (Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper No. 34). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
  40. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide.Chicago: Scientific Software International.School Factors and Cigarette Use
  41. Kandel, D. B., Kessler, R. C., & Margulies, R. Z. (1978). Antecedents of adolescent initiation into stages of drug use: A developmental analysis.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7(1), 13–40. · DOI
  42. Kandel, D. B., Yamaguchi, K., & Chen, K. (1992). Stages of progression in drug involvement from adolescence to adulthood: Further evidence for the gateway theory.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53(5), 447–457. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Kellam, S.G., & Anthony, J. C. (1998). Targeting early antecedents to prevent tobacco smoking: Findings from an epidemiologically based randomized field trial.American Journal of Public Health, 88(10), 1490–1495. · DOI
  44. Lambert, N. M. (1988). Adolescent outcomes for hyperactive children: Perspectives on general and specific patterns of childhood risk for adolescent educational, social, and mental health problems.American Psychologist, 43(10), 786–799. · DOI
  45. Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of person-oriented approach.In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  46. Masten, A. S. (1994). Resilience in individual development: Successful adaptation despite risk and adversity.In M. C. Wang, & E. W. Gordon (Eds.), Educational resilience in inner-city America (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  47. Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children.American Psychologist, 53(2), 205–220. · DOI · Paper page
  48. McCall, R. B., Evahn, C., & Kratzer, L. (1992). High school underachievers.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  49. Mensch B. S., & Kandel, D. B. (1988). Dropping out of high school and drug involvement.Sociology of Education, 61, 95–113. · DOI
  50. Meyers, J. (1989). The practice of psychology in the schools for the primary prevention of learning and adjustment problems in children: A perspective from the field of education.In L. A. Bond, & B. E. Compas (Eds.), Primary prevention and promotion in schools (pp. 391–422). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  51. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennet, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models.Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430–445. · DOI
  52. Muthén, B. (in press). Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class/latent growth modeling. In A. Sayer, & L. Collins (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  53. National Center for Education Statistics. (1991). Teacher survey on safe, disciplined, and drug-free schools (Report No. NCES 91-091). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Education.
  54. National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). The condition of education: 1996 (Report No. NCES 96-304). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Education.
  55. Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Consequences of adolescent drug use: Impact on the lives of young adults.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  56. Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1986). Drug use, educational aspirations, and work force involvement: The transition from adolescence to young adulthood.American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 303–321. · DOI
  57. O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1983). Reliability and consistency in self-reports of drug use.The International Journal of the Addictions, 18(6), 805–824. · DOI
  58. Paulson, M. J., Coombs, R. H., & Richardson, M. A. (1990). School performance, academic aspirations, and drug use among children and adolescents.Journal of Drug Education, 20(4), 289–303. · DOI
  59. Pestello, F. G. (1989). Misbehavior in high school classrooms.Youth and Society, 20, 290–306. · DOI
  60. Petraitis, J., Flay, B. R., & Miller, T. Q. (1995). Reviewing theories of adolescent substance use: Organizing pieces of the puzzle.Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 67–86. · DOI
  61. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  62. Pritchard, C., Cotton, A., & Cox, M. (1992). Truancy and illegal drug use, and knowledge of HIV infection in 932 14–16-year old adolescents.Journal of Adolescence, 15, 1–17. · DOI
  63. Rumberger, R. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school:Amultilevel analysis of students and schools.American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 583–625. · DOI
  64. Schulenberg, J., Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (1994). High school educational success and subsequent substance use: A panel analysis following adolescents into young adulthood.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 45–62. · DOI
  65. Schulenberg, J., Maggs, J. L., & Hurrelmann, K. (1997). Negotiating developmental transitions during adolescence and young adulthood: Health risks and opportunities.In J. Schulenberg, J. L. Maggs, & K. Hurrelmann (Eds.), Health risks and developmental transitions during adolescence (pp. 1–22). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  66. Schulenberg, J., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Wadsworth, K. N., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Getting drunk and growing up: Trajectories of frequent binge drinking during the transition to adulthood.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 289–304. · DOI
  67. Shannon, D. M., James, F. R., & Gansneder, B. M. (1993). The identification of adolescent substance misuse using schoolreported factors.The High School Journal, 76(2), 118–128.
  68. Simmons, R. G., & Blyth, D. A. (1987). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context.New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  69. Smith, G. M., & Fogg, C. P. (1978). Psychological predictors of early use, late use, and nonuse of marijuana among teenage students.In D. B. Kandel (Ed.), Longitudinal research on drug use: Empirical findings and methodological issues (pp. 101–113). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  70. Sommer, B. (1985). Truancy in early adolescence.Journal of Early Adolescence, 5(2), 145–160. · DOI
  71. Swaim, R. C. (1991). Childhood risk factors and adolescent drug and alcohol abuse.Educational Psychology Review, 3(4), 363–398. · DOI
  72. Wagner, B. M., & Compas, B. E. (1990). Gender, instrumentality, and expressivity: Moderators of the relation between stress and psychological symptoms during adolescence.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(3), 383–406. · DOI
  73. Welte, J. W., & Barnes, G. M. (1987). Youthful smoking: Patterns and relationships to alcohol and other drug use.Journal of Adolescence, 10, 327–340. · DOI
  74. White, H. R., Pandina, R. J., & LaGrange, R. L. (1987). Longitudinal predictors of serious substance use and delinquency.Criminology, 25, 715–740. · DOI
  75. Zimiles, H., & Lee, V. E. (1991). Adolescent family structure and educational progress.Developmental Psychology, 27(2), 314–320. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bryant, A. L., Schulenberg, J., Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2000-06
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
71-87
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W1586062240
Cited by
187
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA001411)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
student misbehavior, academic performance, school connectedness, middle adolescence, high school dropout, smoking initiation, prevention programs, gender differences, ethnic differences
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Age Factors, Child Behavior Disorders, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, Object Attachment, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Schools, Smoking, Students, United States, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review