Cited by 858Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryDrug Solubulity and Delivery Systems

The Mechanism of Uptake of Biodegradable Microparticles in Caco-2 Cells Is Size Dependent

Desai, Manisha P., Labhasetwar, Vinod, Walter, Elke, Levy, Robert J., Amidon, Gordon L.·1997·Pharmaceutical Research

Abstract

Purpose To study the uptake of biodegradable microparticles in Caco-2 cells.Methods Biodegradable microparticles of polylactic polyglycolic acid co-polymer (PLGA 50:50) of mean diameters 0.1 micron, 1 micron, and 10 microns containing bovine serum albumin as a model protein and 6-coumarin as a fluorescent marker were formulated by a multiple emulsion technique. The Caco-2 cell monolayers were incubated with each diameter microparticles (100 micrograms/ml) for two hours. The microparticle uptake in Caco-2 cells was studied by confocal microscopy and also by quantitating the 6-coumarin content of the microparticles taken up by the cells. The effects of microparticle concentration, and incubation time and temperature on microparticle cell uptake were also studied.Results The study demonstrated that the Caco-2 cell microparticle uptake significantly depends upon the microparticle diameter. The 0.1 micron diameter microparticles had 2.5 fold greater uptake on the weight basis than the 1 micron and 6 fold greater than the 10 microns diameter microparticles. Similarly in terms of number the uptake of 0.1 micron diameter microparticles was 2.7 x 10(3) fold greater than the 1 micron and 6.7 x 10(6) greater than the 10 microns diameter microparticles. The efficiency of uptake of 0.1 micron diameter microparticles at 100 micrograms/ml concentration was 41% compared to 15% and 6% for the 1 micron and the 10 microns diameter microparticles, respectively. The Caco-2 cell microparticle (0.1 micron) uptake increased with concentration in the range of 100 micrograms/ml to 500 micrograms/ml which then reached a plateau at higher concentration. The uptake of microparticles increased with incubation time, reaching a steady state at two hours. The uptake was greater at an incubation temperature of 37 degrees C compared to at 4 degrees C.Conclusions The Caco-2 cell microparticle uptake was microparticle diameter, concentration, and incubation time and temperature dependent. The small diameter microparticles (0.1 micron) had significantly greater uptake compared to larger diameter microparticles. The results thus suggest that the mechanism of uptake of microparticles in Caco-2 cell is particle diameter dependent. Caco-2 cells are used as an in vitro model for gastrointestinal uptake, and therefore the results obtained in these studies could be of significant importance in optimizing the microparticle-based oral drug delivery systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1012126301290

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transcytosis through the intestinal epithelial layer depends on particle size, with below 1 μm optimal for M-cell absorption, and also on particle charge and hydrophilicity.

    “The capacity of transcytosis through the intestinal epithelial layer depends on the size, with a particle size of below 1 μm for optimal M-cell absorption [30], but also on the charge and hydrophilicity of the particle carrier [31–33].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Desai, M. P., Labhasetwar, V., Walter, E., Levy, R. J., & Amidon, G. L.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Amidon, Gordon L.
Venue
Pharmaceutical Research
Published
1997-11
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
1568-1573
ISSN
  • 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-904X
OpenAlex
W1664986234
Cited by
858
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 62
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmaceutical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
Keywords
Caco-2 cells, biodegradable microparticles, PLGA, microparticle size, intestinal absorption, bovine serum albumin, multiple emulsions, temperature dependence, concentration dependence, incubation time, intestinal epithelial cells, drug delivery systems, oral bioavailability prediction
MeSH terms
Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer, Animals, Cattle, Cell Membrane Permeability, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Microspheres, Models, Biological, Particle Size, Polyglycolic Acid, Polymers, Serum Albumin, Bovine, Microscopy, Confocal, Caco-2 Cells, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review