CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 664Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealth disparities and outcomesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D

Burström, Kristina, Johannesson, Magnus, Diderichsen, Finn·2001·Quality of Life Research
DOI 10.1023/a:1013171831202
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured on population level may be useful to guide policies for health. This study aims to describe the HRQoL; in EQ-5D dimensions, mean rating scale (RS) scores and mean EQ-5D index values, in the general population, by certain disease and socio-economic groups, in Stockholm County 1998. The EQ-5D self-classifier and a RS were included in the 1998 cross-sectional postal Stockholm County public health survey to a representative sample (n = 4950, 20-88 years), 63% response rate. Mean RS score ranged from 0.90 (20-29 years) to 0.69 (80-88 years), mean EQ-5D index value ranged from 0.89 (20-29 years) to 0.74 (80-88 years). For different diseases mean RS scores ranged from 0.80 (asthma) to 0.69 (angina pectoris), mean EQ-5D index values ranged from 0.79 (asthma) to 0.66 (low back pain). The mean health state scores (RS and EQ-5D index) were 0.06 lower in the unskilled manual group than in the higher non-manual group after controlling for age and sex (p < 0.0001). This difference was 0.03 after controlling also for different diseases (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, our results show that the HRQoL varies greatly between socio-economic and disease groups. Furthermore, after controlling for age, sex and disease, HRQoL is lower in manual than in non-manual groups.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1013171831202

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Spilker B, Revicki DA. Taxonomy of quality of life. In: Spilker B (ed), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, 2nd edn, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996.
  2. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 2nd edn., Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1997.
  3. Ohinmaa A, Eija H, Sintonen H. Modelling EuroQol values of Finnish adult population. In: Badia X, Herdman M, Segura A (eds), EuroQol Plenary Meeting, discussion papers. Barcelona: Catalan Institute of Public Health, 1995: 67–76.
  4. Claes C, Greiner W, Uber A, Shulenburg J-M. The new German version of the EuroQol quality of life questionnaire. In: Rabin RE, Busschbach JJV, de Charro FTh, Essink-Bot ML, Bonsel GJ (eds), EuroQol Plenary Meeting Rotterdam 1997, discussion papers. Rotterdam: Centre for Health Policy and Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 1998: 1–23.
  5. Ohinmaa A, Sintonen H. Quality of life of the Finnish population as measured by the EuroQol. In: Badia X, Herdman M, Segura A (eds), EuroQol Plenary Meeting, discussion papers. Barcelona: Catalan Institute of Public Health, 1995: 67–76.
  6. Statistics Sweden. Yrkesklassificeringar i FoB 85 enligt Nordisk yrkesklassificering (NYK) och Socioekonomisk indelning (SEI). Occupations in Population and Housing Census 1985 (FoB 85) according to Nordic standard occupational classification and Swedish socio-economic classification. Reports on Statistical Co-ordination. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden, 1989.
  7. Björk S, Althin R. Health states considered worse than being dead. In: Björk S (ed), EuroQol Conference Proceedings, October 1991, Sweden. IHE Working Paper, Lund: IHE, 1992.
  8. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edn., Vols. 1 and 2, NC: SAS Institute Inc., Cary, 1989.
  9. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/ETS Software: Changes and Enhancements, Release 6.11. NC: SAS Institute Inc., Cary, 1995.
  10. Cutler DM, Richardson E. The value of health: 1970–1990. Am Econ Rev Papers and Proceedings 1998; 88: 97–100.
  11. The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Välfärd, ofärd och ojämlikhet — levnadsförhållanden under 1990–talet. Welfare, misfortune and inequality — living conditions during the 1990s. SOU 2000:41. Stockholm: Norstedts tryckeri AB, 2000. (In Swedish).
  12. OECD. OECD Health Data 2000. Paris: Credes, 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Burström, K., Johannesson, M., & Diderichsen, F.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm School of Economics (SE)
Corresponding author
Burström, Kristina
ORCID
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2001-08
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
621-635
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
DOI
10.1023/a:1013171831202
OpenAlex
W1539664312
Cited by
664
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 37
FWCI
17.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Stockholms Läns Landsting
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
health-related quality of life, EQ-5D, population health, socioeconomic status, disease groups, age and sex differences, Stockholm County
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Socioeconomic Factors, Sweden, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review