Cited by 71Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Peritraumatic dissociative experiences, trauma narratives, and trauma pathology

Zoellner, Lori A., Alvarez‐Conrad, Jennifer, Foa, Edna B.·2002·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Peritraumatic dissociation, i.e., dissociation during or immediately after a traumatic event, has been associated with persistence of trauma-related pathology. Peritraumatic dissociation may interfere with encoding of traumatic memories and this style may impede recovery. This study examines this hypothesis by analyzing trauma narratives from 28 female sexual and nonsexual assault victims who reported either high or low peritraumatic dissociation. Participants were asked to recount their assault. Narratives were videotaped, transcribed, and coded. Narratives of individuals with high peritraumatic dissociation had higher grade levels and a trend toward lower reading ease than those with low peritraumatic dissociation. Both higher grade levels and lower reading ease of prethreat sections of trauma narratives were related to posttreatment reexperiencing and anxiety symptoms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1014383228149

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Cardeña E., 1991, Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionniare
  2. First M. B., 1995, Structured clinical interview for DSM‐IVaxis 1 disorders—patient edition (SC1D‐1/P, Version 2)
  3. 10.1002/jts.2490080409 · DOI
  4. Foa E. B., 1993, American psychiatric press review of psychiatry, 273
  5. Krystal J. H., 1995, Memory distortions: How minds, brains, and societies reconstruct the past, 150
  6. 1994, Microsoft Word (version 6.0) [Computer software]
  7. Spiegel D., 1993, Dissociative disorders: A clinical review, 117

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zoellner, L. A., Alvarez‐Conrad, J., & Foa, E. B.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Zoellner, Lori A.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
49-57
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2068485071
Cited by
71
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh042173-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH042178, MH42173)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
peritraumatic dissociation, trauma narratives, sexual assault, trauma pathology, reading ease
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Memory, Rape, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review